Skip to content
Mason Rudolph

#2Mason Rudolph

QB·Oklahoma State·20172016201511.6 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Mason Rudolph is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for Oklahoma State. Mason's 2016 season ranks in the 55th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 514 plays — a average rate for the QB. Mason's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mason Rudolph's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
284/448 Comp/Att4091 Pass yards28 Pass TD4 INT63.4% Comp %
Rushing
61 Rush yards6 Rush TD83 Carries0.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency55
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat76
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch92
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)55th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Texas (SP+ 11).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7
J.T. BarrettOhio State0.59314.1341.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8400.84Wk 1 vs SE Louisiana: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Central Michigan: -0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Pittsburgh: +0.47 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Baylor: +0.30 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Texas: +0.84 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Iowa State: +0.38 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Kansas: +0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs West Virginia: +0.57 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kansas State: +0.73 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Texas Tech: +0.62 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs TCU: +0.11 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Oklahoma: +0.10 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Colorado: +0.58 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSE LouisianaW61-718/251912070.0-1000.40
2vsCentral MichiganL27-30-6.127/432862135.0-190-0.08
3vsPittsburghW45-3813.126/465402064.6-1800.47
4@BaylorL24-3511.327/452790181.53000.30
5vsTexasW49-3110.619/283923089.5210.84
6vsIowa StateW38-310.726/443514067.8100.38
8@KansasW44-20-15.916/242201057.8-1200.21
9vsWest VirginiaW37-2011.326/362733077.31010.57
10@Kansas StateW43-378.229/384575286.92600.73
11vsTexas TechW45-443.720/283952091.8-710.62
12@TCUW31-611.017/342071064.82320.11
14@OklahomaL20-3826.111/251860041.52810.10
1vsColoradoW38-86.322/323143087.8700.58

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
54.2%
Passing plays
96.1%
Rushing plays
11.5%
Standard downs
48.3%
Passing downs
66.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.56
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.150−0.6820162017
EPA per play · 2015 — 2017 · 39 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Oklahoma State
8.2
213.6
2016Oklahoma State
11.6
283.5
2017Oklahoma State
18.4
387.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.