Skip to content
Logan Diggs

#22Logan Diggs

RB·LSU·2023

Logan Diggs is a Explosive Back for LSU. Logan's 2023 season ranks in the 48th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 119 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Logan Diggs's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
653 Rush yards7 Rush TD119 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions82 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency48
  • Volume55
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency76
  • Receiving26
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)48th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.18 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.63 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Grambling.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6300.63Wk 2 vs Grambling: +0.63 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Mississippi State: +0.30 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arkansas: +0.24 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: +0.46 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Missouri: +0.15 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Auburn: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Army: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Alabama: -0.20 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs Texas A&M: +0.19 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsGramblingW72-10151157.7111800.63
3@Mississippi StateW41-140.59414.6033000.30
4vsArkansasW34-313.514976.901300.24
5@Ole MissL49-5518.4191015.3222200.46
6@MissouriW49-3919.3241345.610.15
7vsAuburnW48-187.618975.410.23
8vsArmyW62-0-4.06264.311900.49
10@AlabamaL28-4223.18243.00-0.20
13vsTexas A&MW42-3015.65173.410.19
20vsWisconsinW35-319.4111.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.3%
Passing plays
2.8%
Rushing plays
36.1%
Standard downs
21.3%
Passing downs
12.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.33
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.