Skip to content
Kyren Williams

#23Kyren Williams

RB·Notre Dame·202120202.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Kyren Williams is a 2-year Featured Back for Notre Dame. Kyren's 2021 season ranks in the 8th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 243 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyren Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1002 Rush yards14 Rush TD204 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
42 Receptions359 Rec yards3 Rec TD8.5 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns29 KR yards0 KR TD14 Punt returns151 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency8
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency69
  • Receiving68
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)8th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Purdue (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Florida State: +0.10 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Toledo: -0.09 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Purdue: +0.68 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wisconsin: -0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Cincinnati: -0.03 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Virginia Tech: +0.13 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs USC: +0.37 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs North Carolina: +0.43 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Navy: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Virginia: +0.19 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: +0.35 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Stanford: +0.39 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Florida StateW41-387.618422.3068310.10
2vsToledoW32-296.916784.913250-0.09
3vsPurdueW27-1310.312917.6124710.68
4vsWisconsinW41-1320.118331.80-0.08
5vsCincinnatiL13-2421.213453.513190-0.03
6@Virginia TechW32-292.419814.3152610.13
8vsUSCW31-16-0.6251385.5264200.37
9vsNorth CarolinaW44-346.4221999.0121500.43
10vsNavyW34-6-8.517955.6273600.19
11@VirginiaW28-37.214705.0121500.19
12vsGeorgia TechW55-0-6.711565.1243100.35
13@StanfordW45-14-10.219743.9222000.39

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.0%
Passing plays
11.6%
Rushing plays
51.3%
Standard downs
34.2%
Passing downs
23.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.15
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.69 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.770−0.322021
EPA per play · 2020 — 2021 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2020Notre Dame
2.4
64.1
2021Notre Dame
2.0
57.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.