Skip to content
Kyren Williams

#23Kyren Williams

RB·Notre Dame·202120202.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Kyren Williams is a 2-year Pass-Catching Back for Notre Dame. Kyren's 2020 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 242 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyren Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
1125 Rush yards13 Rush TD211 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
35 Receptions313 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume83
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency65
  • Receiving70
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.53 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Florida State (SP+ -5).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5300.53Wk 2 vs Duke: +0.36 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Florida: +0.30 EPA/play3Wk 6 vs Florida State: +0.53 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Louisville: +0.05 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Pittsburgh: +0.06 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Georgia Tech: +0.22 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Clemson: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boston College: -0.02 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs North Carolina: +0.24 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Syracuse: +0.13 EPA/play14Wk 16 vs Clemson: -0.23 EPA/play16Wk 1 vs Alabama: +0.09 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
2vsDukeW27-13-4.2191125.9229300.36
3vsSouth FloridaW52-0-11.410626.2021000.30
6vsFlorida StateW42-26-4.9191859.7221100.53
7vsLouisvilleW12-76.5251275.101500.05
8@PittsburghW45-36.017382.2133700.06
9@Georgia TechW31-13-1.015765.1222400.22
10vsClemsonW47-4026.1231406.131-200.19
11@Boston CollegeW45-310.99374.104370-0.02
13@North CarolinaW31-1718.0231245.4242010.24
14vsSyracuseW45-21-9.8201105.5033300.13
16vsClemsonL10-3426.115503.303140-0.23
1vsAlabamaL14-3128.316644.0183100.09

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
29.2%
Passing plays
11.3%
Rushing plays
43.4%
Standard downs
33.6%
Passing downs
19.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.21
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.15

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.770−0.322021
EPA per play · 2020 — 2021 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2020Notre Dame
2.4
64.1
2021Notre Dame
2.0
57.2

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.