Skip to content
Khalil Herbert

#21Khalil Herbert

RB·Virginia Tech·20203.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Khalil Herbert is a Featured Back for Virginia Tech. Khalil's 2020 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 167 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Khalil Herbert's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
1183 Rush yards8 Rush TD155 Carries7.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions179 Rec yards1 Rec TD17.9 Yards/rec
Returns
16 Kick returns430 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume72
  • Explosiveness92
  • Consistency78
  • Receiving41
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (80th percentile).
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.31 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.93 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs NC State (SP+ 0).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9300.93Wk 4 vs NC State: +0.93 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Duke: +0.58 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs North Carolina: +0.50 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Boston College: +0.29 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Wake Forest: +0.25 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisville: +0.14 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Miami: +0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Pittsburgh: +0.40 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Clemson: -0.01 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Virginia: +0.24 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
4vsNC StateW45-240.0610417.3124600.93
5@DukeW38-31-4.22020810.420.58
6@North CarolinaL45-5618.0181387.720.50
7vsBoston CollegeW40-140.9181437.9012910.29
8@Wake ForestL16-230.814644.6023900.25
9@LouisvilleW42-356.5211477.010.14
10vsLibertyL35-386.5
11vsMiamiL24-2512.88496.101700.16
12@PittsburghL14-476.09728.0035700.40
14vsClemsonL10-4526.121964.61110-0.01
15vsVirginiaW33-150.9201628.110.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
25.3%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
36.8%
Standard downs
29.5%
Passing downs
13.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.79
Pass / Rush EPA
0.63 / 0.29

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.020−0.10
EPA per play · 2020 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.