Skip to content
Jonathan Williams
Jonathan Williams

#32Jonathan Williams

RB·Arkansas·20142.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jonathan Williams is a Explosive Back for Arkansas. Jonathan's 2014 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 189 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jonathan Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1190 Rush yards12 Rush TD211 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions65 Rec yards2 Rec TD5.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume71
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency44
  • Receiving30
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency44th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.53 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.33 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Nicholls.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.3302.33Wk 1 vs Auburn: -0.12 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nicholls: +2.33 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas Tech: +0.91 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Texas A&M: +0.10 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Alabama: +0.06 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UAB: +0.55 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Mississippi State: -0.11 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs LSU: +0.01 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Ole Miss: -0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Missouri: +0.27 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Texas: +0.15 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@AuburnL21-4524.27344.912-20-0.12
2vsNichollsW73-7414335.812.33
3@Texas TechW49-284.9221456.6411000.91
4vsNorthern IllinoisW52-14-0.615694.61
5vsTexas A&ML28-3520.218955.310.10
7vsAlabamaL13-1434.320834.212900.06
8vsGeorgiaL32-4527.6181086.0031200.22
9vsUABW45-17-4.2181538.5121310.55
10@Mississippi StateL10-1722.215473.10-0.11
12vsLSUW17-021.518553.110.01
13vsOle MissW30-020.720814.10-0.10
14@MissouriL14-2119.313725.5012310.27
1vsTexasW31-79.0231054.610.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.7%
Passing plays
4.1%
Rushing plays
39.4%
Standard downs
29.7%
Passing downs
15.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.19

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.580−0.36
EPA per play · 2014 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.