Skip to content
Johnny Langan

#21Johnny Langan

TE·Rutgers·2021202020190.0 pts line value1st Round

Johnny Langan is a 3-year Versatile TE for Rutgers. Johnny's 2021 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 58 plays — a developing rate for the TE.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Johnny Langan's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
109 Rush yards3 Rush TD34 Carries3.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions177 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume22
  • Explosiveness19
  • Consistency47
  • Pass-Down57
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs TE peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.69 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Michigan State (SP+ 11).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan MyersRice0.2700.215.9
D'Vaughn PennamonOle Miss0.2000.011.0
Jackson AckerWisconsin0.2100.115.3
Evan SvobodaWyoming0.2900.521.8
Kaden FeaginIllinois0.1500.07.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.6901.69Wk 1 vs Temple: +0.69 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Syracuse: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Delaware: +0.09 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan: +0.31 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ohio State: -0.62 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Michigan State: +1.69 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Illinois: +0.65 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Wisconsin: +0.93 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Indiana: +0.51 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Penn State: -0.16 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Maryland: +0.11 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Wake Forest: -0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsTempleW61-14-19.111919.00190.69
2@SyracuseW17-70.3-0.15
3vsDelawareW45-1334214.00230.09
4@MichiganL13-2023.4177.0070.31
5vsOhio StateL13-5229.3231.502-0.62
6vsMichigan StateL13-3111.21.69
9@IllinoisW20-144.312727.00270.65
10vsWisconsinL3-5220.12136.50110.93
11@IndianaW38-3-7.8199.0090.51
12@Penn StateL0-2814.3100.000-0.16
13vsMarylandL16-406.20.11
1vsWake ForestL10-3810.16579.5027-0.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
7.8%
Passing plays
8.1%
Rushing plays
7.6%
Standard downs
9.0%
Passing downs
5.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.19
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.04

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+2.040−2.1420202021
EPA per play · 2019 — 2021 · 31 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Rutgers
0.0
28.1
2020Rutgers
0.0
17.7
2021Rutgers
0.0
8.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.