Skip to content
Jarveon Williams
Jarveon Williams

#2Jarveon Williams

RB·UTSA·20152.3 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jarveon Williams is a Explosive Back for UTSA. Jarveon's 2015 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 179 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jarveon Williams's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
1042 Rush yards8 Rush TD173 Carries6.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions60 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.7 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns7 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume65
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency53
  • Receiving26
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency53th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.11 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.03 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Colorado State (SP+ 1).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0301.03Wk 1 vs Arizona: +0.00 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas State: -0.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma State: +0.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Colorado State: +1.03 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UTEP: +0.03 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.25 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Southern Miss: +0.07 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs North Texas: +0.76 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Old Dominion: +0.04 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Charlotte: +0.41 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Rice: +0.45 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@ArizonaL32-424.721793.800.00
2vsKansas StateL3-302.610313.10140-0.15
3@Oklahoma StateL14-699.917905.310.25
4vsColorado StateL31-330.51317013.121.03
5@UTEPW25-6-19.5281334.8154500.03
6vsLouisiana TechL31-348.316271.702100-0.25
7@Southern MissL10-321.416885.500.07
9@North TexasL23-30-25.06518.511100.76
10vsOld DominionL31-36-14.85244.800.04
11@CharlotteW30-27-21.7191869.810.41
12vsRiceW34-24-14.6221637.420.45

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
22.7%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
40.5%
Standard downs
28.1%
Passing downs
12.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.160−0.38
EPA per play · 2015 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.