Skip to content
James Butler

#20James Butler

RB·Nevada·20152.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

James Butler is a Explosive Back for Nevada. James's 2015 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 219 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So James Butler's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
1345 Rush yards10 Rush TD208 Carries6.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions44 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume69
  • Explosiveness70
  • Consistency62
  • Receiving24
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency62th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.08 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.41 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Buffalo (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4100.41Wk 1 vs UC Davis: -0.07 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona: -0.03 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas A&M: +0.02 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Buffalo: +0.41 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UNLV: +0.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs New Mexico: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Wyoming: -0.07 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Hawai'i: +0.23 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Fresno State: +0.20 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs San José State: +0.31 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Utah State: +0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs San Diego State: -0.18 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Colorado State: +0.40 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUC DavisW31-1714654.60-0.07
2vsArizonaL20-444.79333.701170-0.03
3@Texas A&ML27-4414.1171076.301300.02
4@BuffaloW24-21-10.31617711.110.41
5vsUNLVL17-23-16.210444.401400.26
6vsNew MexicoW35-17-8.7211456.911-500.12
7@WyomingL21-28-16.710515.10-0.07
8vsHawai'iW30-20-16.3281344.820.23
10@Fresno StateW30-16-12.6181226.8121800.20
11vsSan José StateW37-34-4.5161197.411700.31
12@Utah StateL27-31-0.1171398.220.26
13@San Diego StateL14-318.08202.50-0.18
1vsColorado StateW28-230.5241897.920.40

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.2%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
38.7%
Standard downs
28.9%
Passing downs
13.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.470−0.24
EPA per play · 2015 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.