Skip to content
Holton Ahlers

#12Holton Ahlers

QB·East Carolina·2022202120198.2 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Holton Ahlers is a 3-year Dual-Threat QB for East Carolina. Holton's 2022 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 524 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Holton Ahlers's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
315/469 Comp/Att3708 Pass yards28 Pass TD5 INT67.2% Comp %
Rushing
182 Rush yards6 Rush TD72 Carries2.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.92 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs South Florida (SP+ -17).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9200.92Wk 1 vs NC State: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Old Dominion: +0.26 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Campbell: +0.55 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Navy: +0.36 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Florida: +0.92 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulane: +0.19 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Memphis: +0.40 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCF: +0.53 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs BYU: +0.43 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Cincinnati: +0.22 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Houston: -0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Temple: +0.40 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.56 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNC StateL20-216.825/412672273.85700.39
2vsOld DominionW39-21-13.025/392702069.6-300.26
3vsCampbellW49-1017/202633087.5-510.55
4vsNavyL20-23-7.222/342672158.32300.36
5vsSouth FloridaW48-28-17.031/414656094.0900.92
6@TulaneL9-2412.432/512881252.61700.19
7vsMemphisW47-456.826/343041086.51010.40
8vsUCFW34-1310.330/363111092.3610.53
9@BYUW27-24-1.415/221970087.31820.43
11@CincinnatiL25-2713.126/462802068.61400.22
12vsHoustonL3-424.515/30182003.5-110-0.27
13@TempleW49-46-12.925/373143076.1-100.40
1vsCoastal CarolinaW53-290.626/38300504810.56

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
59.4%
Passing plays
97.0%
Rushing plays
14.5%
Standard downs
51.7%
Passing downs
74.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.41 / 0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.060−0.6420212022
EPA per play · 2019 — 2022 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019East Carolina
7.9
227.3
2021East Carolina
7.1
238.5
2022East Carolina
8.2
251.7

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.