Skip to content
Gavin Harris

#8Gavin Harris

Gavin Harris is a Versatile TE for New Mexico State. Gavin's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 57 plays — a elite rate for the TE.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Gavin Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
36 Receptions514 Rec yards1 Rec TD14.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness49
  • Consistency63
  • Pass-Down57
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.29 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.35 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs New Mexico (SP+ 1).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Seth GreenMinnesota0.3900.032.4
Ty ThompsonTulane0.4200.720.2
Johnny LanganRutgers0.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming0.2900.521.8
Jordan MyersRice0.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3501.35Wk 1 vs Bryant: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulsa: +0.83 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.30 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs New Mexico: +1.35 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Sam Houston: -0.11 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Missouri State: +0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: -0.17 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kennesaw State: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.78 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTEP: +0.08 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.03 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsBryantW19-334414.70330.20
2vsTulsaW21-14-10.033411.31150.83
3@Louisiana TechL14-49-1.335217.30340.30
5@New MexicoL20-380.969716.20261.35
6vsSam HoustonW37-10-27.8177.007-0.11
8@LibertyL27-30-9.046215.5032
9vsMissouri StateL17-24-10.745614.00300.47
10@Western KentuckyL16-351.63299.7011-0.17
11vsKennesaw StateL21-24-5.434214.00200.14
12@TennesseeL9-4215.035016.70250.78
13@UTEPW34-31-17.511313.00130.08
14vsMiddle TennesseeL24-31-16.022814.00160.03

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.0%
Passing plays
13.3%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
6.7%
Passing downs
10.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.