Skip to content
Fluff Bothwell

#24Fluff Bothwell

Fluff Bothwell is a Explosive Back for South Alabama. Fluff's 2024 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 119 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Fluff Bothwell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
834 Rush yards13 Rush TD112 Carries7.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
12 Receptions90 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume46
  • Explosiveness88
  • Consistency72
  • Receiving36
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.70 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Northwestern State.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7001.70Wk 1 vs North Texas: +0.71 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Ohio: +0.54 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Northwestern State: +1.70 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs App State: +0.62 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs LSU: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arkansas State: +0.04 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Troy: -0.01 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs UL Monroe: +0.38 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Georgia Southern: +0.55 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Louisiana: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Southern Miss: +1.37 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas State: +0.68 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorth TexasL38-52-4.56305.0112800.71
2@OhioL20-272.310707.011600.54
3vsNorthwestern StateW87-10714320.421.70
4@App StateW48-14-8.1141168.320.62
5@LSUL10-4215.910171.70280-0.07
6@Arkansas StateL16-18-9.99323.6043100.04
8vsTroyW25-9-6.612534.40380-0.01
9vsUL MonroeW46-17-16.7171197.020.38
10vsGeorgia SouthernL30-34-1.76315.220.55
12@LouisianaW24-224.89384.201900.18
13@Southern MissW35-14-25.6610417.311.37
14vsTexas StateL38-455.468113.520.68

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.0%
Passing plays
3.2%
Rushing plays
28.3%
Standard downs
19.3%
Passing downs
8.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.45
Passing downs
0.51
Pass / Rush EPA
0.67 / 0.43

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.