Skip to content
De'Andre Tamarez
De'Andre Tamarez

#0De'Andre Tamarez

De'Andre Tamarez is a Slot Specialist WR for Marshall. De'Andre's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 52 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So De'Andre Tamarez's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
32 Receptions395 Rec yards2 Rec TD12.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume18
  • Explosiveness36
  • Consistency54
  • Pass-Down25
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency54th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.40 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.93 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Middle Tennessee (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.9301.93Wk 1 vs Georgia: -0.07 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Eastern Kentucky: -0.39 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Middle Tennessee: +1.93 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisiana: +0.09 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Old Dominion: -0.44 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Texas State: +0.50 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.61 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs James Madison: +0.46 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia State: +1.25 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs App State: +0.43 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia Southern: +0.36 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@GeorgiaL7-4524.1144.004-0.07
3vsEastern KentuckyW38-7166.006-0.39
4@Middle TennesseeW42-28-16.034414.71241.93
5@LouisianaL51-54-10.111111.00110.09
7vsOld DominionW48-245.92189.0012-0.44
8vsTexas StateW40-372.335919.70440.50
10@Coastal CarolinaL27-44-15.15459.01140.61
11vsJames MadisonL23-3512.333712.30150.46
12@Georgia StateW30-18-24.547919.80281.25
13@App StateL24-26-11.45428.40160.43
14vsGeorgia SouthernL19-24-9.445012.50240.36

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.3%
Passing plays
15.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.6%
Passing downs
10.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.56
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.49 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.