Skip to content
Davis Webb

#7Davis Webb

QB·California·201610.6 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Davis Webb is a Dual-Threat QB for California. Davis's 2016 season ranks in the 28th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 624 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Davis Webb's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
382/620 Comp/Att4295 Pass yards37 Pass TD12 INT61.6% Comp %
Rushing
-110 Rush yards6 Rush TD33 Carries-3.3 Yards/carry
Punting
7 Punts275 Punt yards39.3 Yards/punt52 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency28
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat60
  • Consistency74
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)28th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.58 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Texas (SP+ 11).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5800.58Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs San Diego State: +0.11 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas: +0.58 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Arizona State: +0.31 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah: +0.47 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oregon State: -0.29 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Oregon: +0.35 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs USC: +0.21 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington: +0.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington State: +0.28 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Stanford: +0.37 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UCLA: +0.20 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsHawai'iW51-31-10.138/544414080.6-1310.48
2@San Diego StateL40-4511.441/725225359.7-1900.11
3vsTexasW50-4310.627/403964078.3-2810.58
4@Arizona StateL41-51-3.032/564785259.4-2100.31
5vsUtahW28-2310.922/353064176.4-1200.47
6@Oregon StateL44-47-4.623/441130116.9-21-0.29
8vsOregonW52-496.142/613255068.8910.35
9@USCL24-4523.634/533332156.6110.21
10vsWashingtonL27-6626.723/472621343.7-610.00
11@Washington StateL21-566.234/534253165.9-800.28
12vsStanfordL31-4516.434/573932053.8200.37
13vsUCLAW36-109.132/483012061.4-1300.20

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.8%
Passing plays
99.8%
Rushing plays
5.0%
Standard downs
56.8%
Passing downs
72.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.660−0.37
EPA per play · 2016 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.