Skip to content
Bo Nix

#10Bo Nix

QB·Oregon·202320222020201911.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Bo Nix is a 4-year Dual-Threat QB for Oregon. Bo's 2022 season ranks in the 73th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 461 plays — a average rate for the QB. Bo's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bo Nix's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2019

5-Star · Blue chip
Stars
247 composite
0.9856
National rank
#33
High school
Pinson Valley
Hometown
Pinson, AL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2022 Production

Passing
294/408 Comp/Att3594 Pass yards29 Pass TD7 INT72.1% Comp %
Rushing
514 Rush yards14 Rush TD88 Carries5.8 Yards/carry
Punting
2 Punts67 Punt yards33.5 Yards/punt34 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency73
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch55
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)73th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs UCLA (SP+ 15).

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8400.84Wk 1 vs Georgia: -0.09 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Eastern Washington: +0.74 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs BYU: +0.70 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Washington State: +0.52 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Stanford: +0.40 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arizona: +0.71 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs UCLA: +0.84 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs California: +0.53 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Colorado: +0.69 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington: +0.67 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Utah: +0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oregon State: +0.25 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs North Carolina: +0.17 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsGeorgiaL3-4935.321/371730258.9370-0.09
2vsEastern WashingtonW70-1428/332775092.01800.74
3vsBYUW41-20-1.413/182222090.83530.70
4@Washington StateW44-419.533/444283187.53000.52
5vsStanfordW45-27-7.216/291612075.914120.40
6@ArizonaW49-22-3.220/252650096.37030.71
8vsUCLAW45-3015.022/282835096.35100.84
9@CaliforniaW42-24-3.027/354123287.65930.53
10@ColoradoW49-10-20.420/242742088.91620.69
11vsWashingtonL34-3715.719/272802090.95910.67
12vsUtahW20-1719.225/372871180.3-300.26
13@Oregon StateL34-3814.327/413272078.8-500.25
1vsNorth CarolinaW28-277.823/3020521600.17

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.7%
Passing plays
94.9%
Rushing plays
16.8%
Standard downs
49.4%
Passing downs
61.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.47
Passing downs
0.55
Pass / Rush EPA
0.44 / 0.77

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.250−0.32202020222023
EPA per play · 2019 — 2023 · 51 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Auburn
5.6
200.8
2020Auburn
3.8
178.5
2022Oregon
11.2
278.6
2023Oregon
16.7
390.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.