Skip to content
Anthony Gordon

#18Anthony Gordon

QB·Washington State·20199.6 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Anthony Gordon is a Clutch Passer for Washington State. Anthony's 2019 season ranks in the 30th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 704 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Anthony Gordon's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
493/689 Comp/Att5575 Pass yards48 Pass TD16 INT71.6% Comp %
Rushing
-20 Rush yards0 Rush TD51 Carries-0.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency30
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency79
  • Clutch70
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)30th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency79th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.56 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs New Mexico State (SP+ -22).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4
Drake MayeNorth Carolina0.52313.0369.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5600.56Wk 1 vs New Mexico State: +0.56 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Colorado: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Houston: +0.42 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UCLA: +0.48 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Utah: +0.05 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Arizona State: +0.39 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Colorado: +0.31 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oregon: +0.18 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs California: -0.02 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Stanford: +0.20 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Oregon State: +0.47 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Washington: -0.09 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Air Force: +0.46 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsNew Mexico StateW58-7-22.029/354205098.5-700.56
2vsNorthern ColoradoW59-1731/394644194.81000.29
3vsHoustonW31-24-4.336/484403181.51600.42
4vsUCLAL63-67-3.941/615709284.32100.48
5@UtahL13-3819.530/492521235.1100.05
7@Arizona StateL34-386.344/644663079.0100.39
8vsColoradoW41-10-4.135/513694179.3-500.31
9@OregonL35-3719.032/504063265.5100.18
11@CaliforniaL20-33-2.645/5840721-30-0.02
12vsStanfordW49-22-4.744/6052051-100.20
13vsOregon StateW54-53-0.750/7060663-900.47
14@WashingtonL13-3118.348/6230802-330-0.09
1vsAir ForceL21-3112.128/4234730-1200.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
78.2%
Passing plays
96.0%
Rushing plays
20.4%
Standard downs
77.5%
Passing downs
79.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.24
Passing downs
0.40
Pass / Rush EPA
0.32 / -0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.620−0.16
EPA per play · 2019 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.