Skip to content
Ainias Smith

Ainias Smith

WR·Texas A&M·20200.5 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Ainias Smith is a Versatile WR for Texas A&M. Ainias's 2020 season ranks in the 50th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 116 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ainias Smith's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2020 Production

Rushing
293 Rush yards4 Rush TD49 Carries6.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
42 Receptions490 Rec yards6 Rec TD11.7 Yards/rec
Returns
15 Punt returns75 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2020 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency50
  • Volume47
  • Explosiveness31
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down49
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)50th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.22 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.02 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Arkansas (SP+ 2).

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Shai WertsGeorgia Southern0.3101.039.7
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6
Malik DunnerBall State0.2900.422.0
Jafar ArmstrongNotre Dame0.3201.025.3
Jerrod HeardTexas0.2901.633.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.0201.02Wk 4 vs Vanderbilt: -0.02 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Alabama: +0.65 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida: +0.03 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Mississippi State: +0.07 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Arkansas: +1.02 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs South Carolina: +0.67 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs LSU: -0.02 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Auburn: +0.60 EPA/play14Wk 16 vs Tennessee: +0.58 EPA/play16Wk 1 vs North Carolina: +1.00 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
4vsVanderbiltW17-12-16.822713.5026-0.02
5@AlabamaL24-5228.3612320.52470.65
6vsFloridaW41-3819.83-21-7.00300.03
7@Mississippi StateW28-14-1.45204.0190.07
9vsArkansasW42-311.666711.21351.02
10@South CarolinaW48-3-2.43227.31120.67
13vsLSUW20-76.033612.0018-0.02
14@AuburnW31-2012.646215.50380.60
16@TennesseeW34-130.94297.31110.58
1vsNorth CarolinaW41-2718.0612520.80541.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.6%
Passing plays
19.4%
Rushing plays
14.2%
Standard downs
17.0%
Passing downs
15.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.37
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.47 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.130−0.13
EPA per play · 2020 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.