Skip to content
Malik Dunner

#4Malik Dunner

WR·Ball State·201820170.4 pts line value1st Round

Malik Dunner is a 2-year Versatile WR for Ball State. Malik's 2017 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 91 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Malik Dunner's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
440 Rush yards8 Rush TD74 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
18 Receptions139 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.7 Yards/rec
Returns
30 Kick returns709 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume33
  • Explosiveness5
  • Consistency0
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Tennessee Tech.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6
Noah ShortArmy0.3000.520.7
Xavier WhiteTexas Tech0.3000.518.6
Dawan ScottMiami (OH)0.2800.818.5
Jafar ArmstrongNotre Dame0.3201.025.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Illinois: -0.14 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UAB: +0.19 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tennessee Tech: +0.68 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Western Kentucky: +0.41 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Michigan: -0.61 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Akron: +0.21 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Central Michigan: -0.50 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Toledo: +0.40 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.39 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Northern Illinois: +0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Buffalo: +0.39 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Miami (OH): -0.08 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@IllinoisL21-24-7.4188.008-0.14
2vsUABW51-31273.5060.19
3vsTennessee TechW28-1322814.00160.68
4@Western KentuckyL21-33-4.925427.00410.41
5@Western MichiganL3-55-2.42-3-1.500-0.61
6@AkronL3-31-17.63289.30190.21
8vsCentral MichiganL9-56-8.6155.005-0.50
9vsToledoL17-586.6188.0080.40
10@Eastern MichiganL14-56-5.31-5-5.000-0.39
11@Northern IllinoisL17-63-1.40.16
12vsBuffaloL24-40-11.2221.0040.39
13vsMiami (OH)L7-28-2.2177.007-0.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.5%
Passing plays
7.2%
Rushing plays
15.8%
Standard downs
11.6%
Passing downs
11.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.35
Passing downs
-0.07
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.08 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.940−0.882018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017Ball State
0.4
22.0
2018Ball State
0.0
9.4

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.