Skip to content

Ball State Cardinals

Mid-American·1-1·
Elo
1112#134
SP+
-25.0#134
FPI
-19.0
AP
NR
Next@ Liberty · Wk 3Win prob 10%Model +19.5
Talent #113 (563.9)Recruiting class #1136% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Ball State

All news

Julian Sayin produced 10 of Ohio State's 17 explosive plays

Matchup · 6d ago

Ohio State -50.8, and a 0% Cover Chance the Simulation Doesn't Support

Matchup · Aug 31

Roster · 117 players

FR 45SO 23JR 29SR 20
#PlayerPosClHtWt
6Keldric LusterQBJR5'10"248
9Tyler MizzellQBJR6'1"176
13Khalel WrightQBFR6'1"194
16Mason AtkinsQBFR6'3"210
18Bodie DerrerQBSO6'2"210
0Elijah JacksonRBJR5'8"181
2Jalen BondsRBFR6'0"220
4TJ HortonRBJR5'10"201
20Johnny Thompson Jr.RBJR5'11"198
21Anthony McMullen Jr.RBFR5'11"216
25Char'Rese BreveardRBFR5'8"175
1Donovan HamiltonWRSO6'4"217
3Corey Thompson Jr.WRJR5'10"167
5Jabari Smith Jr.WRJR5'9"163
7CJ NelsonWRSR5'11"180
10Jamarion McDougleWRSR6'0"180
11Isaiah ThackerWRJR5'11"196
14Elisha DurhamWRSO6'1"168
15Tayshon BardoWRFR6'1"175
80Derion TalbertWRFR5'8"162
82TJ ByardWRSO6'1"180
83Eli HohltWRJR6'0"181
85Ace CooperWRFR5'10"166
86DJ YoungWRJR6'0"175
8Mason RigginsTEFR6'5"255
12Alex ScherleTESR6'4"234
41Zach BeckerTEFR6'3"210
42AJ SeymourTEFR6'2"215
44Lucas AndresenTEFR6'3"210
81Leo CollinsTEJR6'3"233
84Tate HooverTEJR6'2"254
87Cole CoonrodTEJR6'5"243
89Sean WardTESR6'5"255
54Evan DownerOLFR6'4"285
55Michael VaronOLFR6'3"308
56Jacob JeudyOLSR6'3"289
57Nolan CiceroOLFR6'4"304
60Blake ScriberOLSO6'2"287
61Luke DaltonOLSR6'5"300
62Sam SpicerOLFR6'4"295
63Maxwell WentzOLSR6'4"295
65Ryan EldridgeOLFR6'7"289
66Chris HoodOLSR6'10"327
67Jackson RuessOLJR6'4"302
68Grant HaworthOLSO6'2"299
70Tristan CookOLSO6'6"291
71Brady BarrowmanOLFR6'4"304
72Brady WeberOLFR6'5"275
73Cole MosierOLJR6'4"302
75Zach BandyOLSO6'5"293
76CJ ZeltwangerOLFR6'4"295
77Misael SandovalOLJR6'6"332
78Kaden MayleOLFR6'5"274
79Zion HaneyOLFR6'4"280
3George OkorieDESO6'3"253
7Ben MarshDEJR6'2"247
10Austin StiefDESR6'4"246
39Maverick GracioDEJR6'4"252
91Jamar BirdenDEFR6'2"225
51CJ SanchezDTFR6'5"250
52Michael ThackerDTFR6'0"304
54Spencer VakaDTJR6'1"299
55Dominic InfeliseDTFR6'4"285
56Ameir GlennDTSO6'1"303
57Reese HillDTSO6'3"302
74Khristian ZacharyDTSR6'3"303
90Lincoln MasonDTFR6'6"285
93Mason HolbrookDTFR6'2"268
94Ka'Shawn ThomasDTJR6'1"292
95Keilan SmithDTJR6'2"326
96Joshua ColemanDTFR6'2"300
97Myles HancockDTSO6'1"280
99Kendrick GilbertDTJR6'4"271
6Cincear LewisLBSR6'2"227
9Justin ThomasLBSR6'0"242
15Jovan ClarkLBFR5'10"203
16Kaleb StewartLBSO6'0"248
25Mikeah WebsterLBFR6'1"243
26Lucas SzymborskiLBFR6'1"221
27Gavin ForshaLBSR6'2"224
31Jared BadieLBSR6'3"237
36Cole MynettLBFR6'2"220
40Gannon KnowlesLBFR6'0"210
42Layton StarksLBSO6'4"237
48Sam FeeneyLBSO6'2"205
50Carsen BurckhardtLBFR5'10"223
0Derek FieldsDBJR6'1"195
1Sterling SmithDBJR6'0"201
2Tobi AdewoyinDBSO5'11"189
4Willizhuan YatesDBJR6'0"175
5Chris JacksonDBSR5'11"164
8Avery StuartDBJR6'1"204
11Donovan LanierDBFR6'0"176
12Deondre ShepherdDBSO5'11"192
13Kamron ChambleDBFR5'11"184
14Anthony PinnaceDBSR6'0"180
17Kamari WilliamsDBSO6'2"180
18Cedric Franklin IIDBSO6'0"193
19Zyon HillDBFR6'4"200
20Sebastian MooreDBFR6'1"175
21Dianté GriffinDBSR5'9"187
22Gavin Yates-LyonsDBFR6'2"175
23Jordan SuggsDBSO6'0"169
24Gabe ArambolesDBFR5'11"224
28Stone PerkinsDBFR5'11"197
29Micah LillardDBSO6'1"196
33Quentavius ScandrettDBSR6'3"210
35Drew BosticDBFR5'9"175
38Jayden BernavilDBJR5'7"188
45Cole EarlewineDBJR5'11"207
37Hudson FienePKJR5'10"180
38Brody BoehmPKSO6'1"208
98Carson HolmerPKSR6'1"210
19Lachlan MathiesonPFR6'2"195
92Cole StumbaughPSO6'2"223
34Coby TrippLSFR5'11"202
45Caden BrittonLSSR5'10"208

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
22.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
36.5
scoring defense
Differential
-14.5
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
323.5#110
Yards / play
5.1#112
Passing yards / game
188.0#102
Rushing yards / game
135.5#87
First downs / game
18.0#102
3rd down %
25.0%#123
4th down %
66.7%#45
Time of possession
30:45#64
Defense
Yards allowed / game
500.5#130
Yards / play allowed
7.4#129
Pass yards allowed / game
290.5#123
Rush yards allowed / game
210.0#123
3rd down % allowed
34.6%#66
Sacks
4#42
Tackles for loss
11#41
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+1#36
Takeaways
3#30
Giveaways
2#68
Penalties / game
7.0#79
Penalty yards / game
57.0#80

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Ball State is in year 2 under Mike Uremovich. The strengths are offensive, led by 22nd at hitting chunk plays. The way in is 137th at throwing it, and they are 137th at moving the ball on the ground.

Ball State has played 1 game against a soft slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Offensehitting chunk plays
    #22
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensethrowing it
    #137
    projected
  • Offensemoving the ball on the ground
    #137
    projected
  • Offensesurviving second and twelve
    #137
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
4.08.0
projected final record (now 11)
Exp. wins left
3.0
of 10 games
Bowl odds
12%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
67%
vs Massachusetts
Toughest
1%
vs Northwestern

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

1234567891011
final winstallest bar = 30% chance
Likeliest finish 4-8 (30%)Bowl eligible 12% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
WRIsaiah Thacker, Jabari Smith +5
+16.2 EPA
QBKeldric Luster, Tyler Mizzell
+13.1 EPA
RBTJ Horton, Jalen Bonds
+6.2 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +13.70.196/play70 snaps
RBTJ Horton
~$145K
EPA -3.7-0.177/play21 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.1226th#102
Def0.3211th#123
Explosiveness
Off1.4989th#16
Def1.4319th#112
Field position
Off69.747th#74
Def75.424th#105
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off3.3328th#99
Def5.636th#130
Turnovers
Won 3Lost 2
Margin +1

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.1621st#109
Off · rush
0.2466th#47

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.2465th#49
Def0.2411th#123
Passing
Off0.1621st#109
Def0.3823rd#107

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
2.98#73
2nd-level / open-field
1.21 / 3.10
Power / stuff (off)
66.7% / 14.3%
Havoc — total (def)
14.5%#90
Havoc — front 7 / DB
8.0% / 6.5%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off-0.06
Def0.35
Pass downs
Off0.48
Def0.25

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense-0.11#1140.14#830.46#89
Defense0.19#1210.21#910.61#100

Elo Trajectory

@Ohio StateFinal
Elo rating 11731076-97 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play-0.244th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.671st
  • Offense success rate21%1st
  • Defense success rate allowed56%4th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs26%3rd
  • Offense success — passing downs14%6th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs65%1st
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs32%39th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.368th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.420th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs0.8822nd
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs2.375th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards1.22nd
  • Defense line yards allowed3.314th
  • Offense highlight yards0.3220th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed3.43rd
  • Offense power success0.007th
  • Defense power success allowed0.7548th
  • Offense stuff rate0.326th
  • Defense stuff rate0.1842nd

Third down

  • Third down conversion21%11th
  • Third down distance faced9.05th
  • Third down conversion allowed50%21st
  • Third down distance forced8.168th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half-0.371st
  • Net success rate — second half-0.342nd

Drives

  • Points per drive0.2711th
  • Points per drive allowed4.77th
  • Average starting field position2959th
  • Opponent starting field position2480th
  • Available yards gained19%4th
  • Available yards allowed71%12th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive73%36th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed92%22nd
  • Points per scoring opportunity0.388th
  • Points allowed per opportunity5.17th
  • Three-and-out rate55%8th
  • Three-and-outs forced17%26th

Roster

  • Returning usage17%17th
  • Returning EPA5.64th
  • Team talent composite56418th
  • Recruiting class rank11318th
  • Recruiting class points17018th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Run-first offense — below average EPA/play nationally
EPA/play
+0.119#102 · below avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.163#109
Rush EPA/play
+0.242#49
Explosiveness
1.493#16
Pts/opportunity
3.33#99
Success rate
33.7%

Rush efficiency edge: 0.079 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.321#123 · bottom 20%
Havoc rate (total)
14.5%#90
Front-7 havoc
8.0%
DB havoc
6.5%
Big play rate allowed
1.431#112
Success rate allowed
44.9%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

22.0 PPG offense, 36.5 allowed — -14.5 margin/game
Points per game
22.0
Points allowed/game
36.5
Scoring margin/game
-14.5
Turnover margin
+1won 3 · lost 2
Production returning
6%
Talent rank (247)
#113

1-1 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE26thEXPLOSIVENESS89thFINISHING28thFIELD POS47thDEFENSE11thHAVOC35th50th100th
Offense
26th
Explosiveness
89th
Finishing
28th
Field Pos
47th
Defense
11th
Havoc
35th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
-22.5
#135
Offense
-16.2
#138
Defense
+6.3
#124
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive0.274.67
Starting field positionown 29.4own 23.8
Available yards18.6%71.3%
Scoring opportunities72.7%91.7%
Points per opportunity0.385.09
Three-and-out rate54.5%16.7%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
64.7%
Expected, given the spots
58.2%
Over expected
+6.5
Fourth down vs peers
-19
Fourth down vs the model
-50
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Ball State is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Ball State in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Boise StateSP+ +5.2
Off EPA/play +0.113Def EPA/play +0.277Elo 1569
Match
98%
Oregon StateSP+ -6.8
Off EPA/play +0.183Def EPA/play +0.312Elo 1260
Match
97%
Texas StateSP+ -7.8
Off EPA/play +0.185Def EPA/play +0.326Elo 1441
Match
97%
East CarolinaSP+ -8.1
Off EPA/play +0.174Def EPA/play +0.257Elo 1477
Match
96%
RutgersSP+ -3.6
Off EPA/play +0.124Def EPA/play +0.234Elo 1372
Match
95%
RiceSP+ -10.4
Off EPA/play +0.060Def EPA/play +0.229Elo 1196
Match
94%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -22.8, #117 of 1282016: -13.2, #103 of 1282017: -29.1, #127 of 1302018: -13.8, #106 of 1302019: -5.8, #84 of 1302020: +8.8, #35 of 1242021: -16.7, #107 of 1302022: -14.6, #112 of 1312023: -13.9, #105 of 1332024: -21.5, #125 of 1342025: -27.9, #133 of 1362026: -22.5, #135 of 138
20152026
Now -22.5 · #135 of 138Best +8.8 in 2020Worst -29.1 in 2017

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-10-0
50%
1.0-0.0
20254-83-5
33%
2.9+1.1
20243-92-6
25%
3.4-0.4
20234-83-5
33%
5.7-1.7
20225-73-5
42%
4.6+0.4
20216-74-4
46%
4.2+1.8
20207-16-1
88%
5.3+1.7
20195-74-4
42%
5.1-0.1
20184-83-5
33%
3.9+0.1
20172-100-8
17%
2.4-0.4

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

0.0%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-1 so far, projected to finish 4.2-7.8. Wins the Mid-American in 0.8%.

If they finish with…

0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count.

up 0.0 points since preseasonlost 3-56 to Ohio State against an expected margin of 60, so +7.2 against the number.

  • The Mid-American takes 0.05 bids in an average season.
  • One bid goes to the best champion outside the P4. They take it in 0.0% of seasons, having won their league in 100% of those.

Ball State’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk3at Liberty0.1
  • wk12at Ohio0.0
  • wk5vs Toledo0.0
  • wk7at Bowling Green0.0
  • wk11vs Buffalo0.0
  • wk10at Massachusetts0.0

Who to root for

Games Ball State is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk5Georgia State over Old Dominion0.0
  • wk11Stanford over Virginia Tech0.0
  • wk8Georgia State over Arkansas State0.0
  • wk2Illinois State over Northern Illinois0.0
  • wk9Texas State over Boise State0.0
  • wk12Charlotte over Tulsa0.0
The full playoff picture →

Mid-American

0-0 in league play, projected 3.2-4.811 of 13 by title odds
0.8%
Wins the Mid-American
3.0%
Reaches the title game

The Mid-American sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 46% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk5Toledo at Ball State2.8
  • wk12Ball State at Ohio2.6
  • wk2Monmouth at Western Michigan2.5
  • wk6Ball State at Northwestern2.3

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Mid-American race →

If not the playoff, then

24%
Bowl eligible
23%
Placed in a bowl
0.0%
In the playoff
77%
Season over in November

Ball State is 0-1 and needs 6 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 1.2% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Famous Idaho Potato Bowl5.4%
  • Arizona Bowl5.1%
  • Salute to Veterans Bowl3.9%
  • Myrtle Beach Bowl2.7%
  • 68 Ventures Bowl1.6%
  • Boca Raton Bowl1.6%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 6 have sent Ball State a player since 2010 — 13 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Ball State's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
CathedralIN40
Ben DavisIN30
StephensonGA30
Archbishop RummelLA10
Hinsdale CentralIL10
PlaquemineLA10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.