Skip to content
Isaiah Thacker

#11Isaiah Thacker

Isaiah Thacker is a Slot Specialist WR for Ball State.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Isaiah Thacker's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
2 Receptions14 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume6
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency69
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 1.54 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Akron (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Micah DavisAir Force0.3700.616.3
JoJo NatsonUtah State0.3901.019.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5401.54Wk 8 vs Akron: +1.54 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs Eastern Michigan: -0.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Toledo: +0.57 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
8vsAkronW42-28-13.911010.00101.54
12vsEastern MichiganL9-24-14.7144.004-0.13
13@ToledoL9-386.00.57

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
2.2%
Passing plays
3.7%
Rushing plays
1.3%
Standard downs
0.6%
Passing downs
4.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
2.56
Passing downs
0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / 0.90

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.