Skip to content
Micah Davis

#6Micah Davis

WR·Air Force·20210.6 pts line value1st Round

Micah Davis is a Vertical Threat WR for Air Force. Micah's 2021 season ranks in the 67th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 58 plays — a average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Micah Davis's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
360 Rush yards4 Rush TD47 Carries7.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
10 Receptions221 Rec yards2 Rec TD22.1 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Kick returns47 KR yards0 KR TD2 Punt returns20 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency67
  • Volume34
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency77
  • Pass-Down49
Player type
Vertical Threat WR

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)67th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency77th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.26 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs New Mexico (SP+ -19).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Keytaon ThompsonVirginia0.3700.615.2
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.3400.722.4
JoJo NatsonUtah State0.3901.019.9
Aaron BedgoodLiberty0.3501.121.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2601.26Wk 2 vs Navy: +0.20 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Utah State: +1.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.53 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs New Mexico: +1.26 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Wyoming: +0.85 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Boise State: +0.67 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs San Diego State: -0.25 EPA/play8
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsLafayetteW35-1422713.5017
2@NavyW23-3-8.512727.00270.20
3vsUtah StateL45-490.1411027.51561.04
4vsFlorida AtlanticW31-7-5.212424.00240.53
5@New MexicoW38-10-18.61.26
6vsWyomingW24-140.623316.51200.85
7@Boise StateW24-179.40.67
8vsSan Diego StateL14-208.3-0.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.0%
Passing plays
27.4%
Rushing plays
9.8%
Standard downs
9.1%
Passing downs
19.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.61
Passing downs
0.60
Pass / Rush EPA
0.86 / 0.50

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.410−0.40
EPA per play · 2021 · 7 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.