Skip to content
Aaron Bedgood

#82Aaron Bedgood

WR·Liberty·20231.1 pts line value1st Round

Aaron Bedgood is a Versatile WR for Liberty. Aaron's 2023 season ranks in the 80th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 73 plays — a above-average rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Aaron Bedgood's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
552 Rush yards3 Rush TD58 Carries9.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
21 Receptions220 Rec yards2 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec
Returns
23 Kick returns463 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency80
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness23
  • Consistency56
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the WR position (80th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.20 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 3.76 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Buffalo (SP+ -15).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Zach AbeyNavy0.3700.825.9
Jafar ArmstrongNotre Dame0.3201.025.3
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.3400.722.4
Isaiah WilliamsIllinois0.3801.222.4
Chris TyreeNotre Dame0.3100.623.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.7603.76Wk 1 vs Bowling Green: +1.09 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs New Mexico State: -0.74 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Buffalo: +3.76 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Florida International: -0.07 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Sam Houston: -0.04 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Jacksonville State: +0.79 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.71 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Western Kentucky: +0.39 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.98 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Old Dominion: +0.63 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Massachusetts: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UTEP: +0.43 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs New Mexico State: +0.81 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsBowling GreenW34-24-7.823015.00191.09
2vsNew Mexico StateW33-17-1.8144.004-0.74
3@BuffaloW55-27-15.23.76
4@Florida InternationalW38-6-21.2144.004-0.07
6vsSam HoustonW21-16-13.8-0.04
7@Jacksonville StateW31-13-1.624120.51290.79
8vsMiddle TennesseeW42-35-9.52189.00110.71
9@Western KentuckyW42-29-2.034314.30180.39
10vsLouisiana TechW56-30-12.92199.51150.98
11vsOld DominionW38-10-10.1166.0060.63
12vsMassachusettsW49-25-17.53206.70100.27
13@UTEPW42-28-16.20.43
14vsNew Mexico StateW49-35-1.823316.50180.81
20vsOregonL6-4526.2221.004

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.1%
Passing plays
7.2%
Rushing plays
8.6%
Standard downs
9.2%
Passing downs
4.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.45
Passing downs
1.19
Pass / Rush EPA
0.70 / 0.50

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+4.210−1.19
EPA per play · 2023 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.