Skip to content
Zach Charbonnet

#24Zach Charbonnet

RB·UCLA·202220214.5 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Zach Charbonnet is a 2-year Featured Back for UCLA. Zach's 2021 season ranks in the 68th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 232 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Zach Charbonnet's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2021 Production

Rushing
1137 Rush yards13 Rush TD202 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
24 Receptions197 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2021 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency68
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency65
  • Receiving52
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)68th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.52 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.70 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs LSU (SP+ 4).

NIL Market Tier· 2021

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Ameer AbdullahNebraska0.3805.399.6
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.7001.70Wk 1 vs LSU: +1.70 EPA/play1Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +1.70 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Fresno State: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Stanford: +0.33 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Arizona State: +0.01 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Arizona: +0.23 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Washington: +0.24 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oregon: -0.02 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Utah: +0.23 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Colorado: +0.38 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs USC: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs California: +0.25 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsLSUW38-274.11111710.6113501.70
1vsHawai'iW44-10-2.3610617.7311401.70
3vsFresno StateL37-4010.86193.220.49
4@StanfordW35-24-10.2231185.1155700.33
5vsArizona StateL23-4211.821894.202500.01
6@ArizonaW34-16-12.6211175.600.23
7@WashingtonW24-17-0.7211316.2021000.24
8vsOregonL31-3410.215352.303210-0.02
9@UtahL24-4415.211655.912200.23
11vsColoradoW44-20-10.017673.931600.38
12@USCW62-33-0.6281676.011600.27
13vsCaliforniaW42-143.4221064.8164100.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.4%
Passing plays
7.9%
Rushing plays
41.3%
Standard downs
31.0%
Passing downs
18.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.57
Pass / Rush EPA
0.20 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.880−0.192022
EPA per play · 2021 — 2022 · 22 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021UCLA
4.5
84.2
2022UCLA
5.1
89.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.