Skip to content
Trevone Boykin

#2Trevone Boykin

QB·TCU·2015201412.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Trevone Boykin is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for TCU. Trevone's 2014 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 579 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Trevone Boykin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
301/492 Comp/Att3901 Pass yards33 Pass TD10 INT61.2% Comp %
Rushing
707 Rush yards8 Rush TD152 Carries4.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency80
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency80th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.68 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Texas Tech (SP+ 5).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Baker MayfieldOklahoma0.56114.1323.7
Bailey ZappeWestern Kentucky0.60013.3372.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6800.68Wk 1 vs Samford: +0.39 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Minnesota: +0.09 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs SMU: +0.57 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Oklahoma: +0.32 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Baylor: +0.05 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma State: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas Tech: +0.68 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs West Virginia: -0.01 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Kansas State: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kansas: +0.17 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Texas: +0.20 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Iowa State: +0.65 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Ole Miss: +0.26 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsSamfordW48-1429/413202085.92910.39
3vsMinnesotaW30-76.827/462582151.59200.09
5@SMUW56-0-21.223/362804091.76220.57
6vsOklahomaW37-3319.220/383182150.67700.32
7@BaylorL58-6123.921/472871049.34500.05
8vsOklahoma StateW42-98.626/394103179.54100.49
9vsTexas TechW82-274.922/394337086.12800.68
10@West VirginiaW31-308.412/301661122.1491-0.01
11vsKansas StateW41-2016.323/342191087.012330.43
12@KansasW34-30-9.826/363301161.9200.17
14@TexasW48-109.020/342332163.25010.20
15vsIowa StateW55-3-7.930/414604169.24400.65
1vsOle MissW42-320.722/311873367.66500.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
60.8%
Passing plays
93.6%
Rushing plays
26.9%
Standard downs
54.0%
Passing downs
76.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.960−0.252015
EPA per play · 2014 — 2015 · 24 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2014TCU
12.7
315.4
2015TCU
11.9
282.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.