#6Tre Williams III

TE·North Texas·2025

Tre Williams III is a Slot Specialist TE for North Texas. Tre's 2025 season produced 23.8 total EPA across 41 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.42
Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
Total EPA (value)0.46
Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tre Williams III's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving

30 Receptions375 Rec yards5 Rec TD12.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

Efficiency100
Volume12
Explosiveness37
Consistency71
Pass-Down98

Player type

Slot Specialist TE

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency71th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
▸10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.20 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.58 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs South Alabama (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Ty Thompson	Tulane	2024	48	0.420	0.7	20.2
Seth Green	Minnesota	2018	83	0.390	0.0	32.4
Johnny Langan	Rutgers	2020	59	0.300	0.0	17.7
Evan Svoboda	Wyoming	2024	75	0.290	0.5	21.8
Jordan Myers	Rice	2021	59	0.270	0.2	15.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Rec TD	Long	EPA/play
1	vsLamar	W51-0	—	2	11	5.5	0	7	-0.70
2	@Western Michigan	W33-30	-1.4	2	21	10.5	1	18	0.83
3	vsWashington State	W59-10	3.8	2	26	13.0	1	20	2.52
4	@Army	W45-38	0.8	2	20	10.0	0	18	0.82
5	vsSouth Alabama	W36-22	-12.7	1	27	27.0	0	27	2.58
7	vsSouth Florida	L36-63	11.6	2	15	7.5	1	10	0.49
8	vsUTSA	W55-17	3.7	2	18	9.0	0	12	-0.20
9	@Charlotte	W54-20	-26.7	5	60	12.0	0	30	0.63
10	vsNavy	W31-17	6.2	3	35	11.7	0	26	0.81
12	@UAB	W53-24	-15.8	1	18	18.0	0	18	1.57
13	@Rice	W56-24	-14.8	2	62	31.0	1	56	2.15
14	vsTemple	W52-25	-5.1	1	6	6.0	0	6	0.18
15	@Tulane	L21-34	6.3	4	52	13.0	1	22	1.27
20	vsSan Diego State	W49-47	6.7	1	4	4.0	0	4	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.2%

Passing plays

8.7%

Rushing plays

0.0%

Standard downs

3.6%

Passing downs

6.3%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.47
Passing downs: 0.76
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.58 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).