Skip to content
Terry Swanson

#2Terry Swanson

RB·Toledo·20172.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Terry Swanson is a Featured Back for Toledo. Terry's 2017 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 252 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Terry Swanson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Rushing
1363 Rush yards14 Rush TD242 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
20 Receptions194 Rec yards0 Rec TD9.7 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume81
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency63
  • Receiving36
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency63th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.51 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Ball State (SP+ -20).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5100.51Wk 1 vs Elon: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nevada: +0.07 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulsa: +0.26 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami: +0.10 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Central Michigan: +0.25 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Akron: +0.34 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Ball State: +0.51 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Northern Illinois: +0.10 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ohio: -0.45 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Bowling Green: +0.38 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Michigan: +0.10 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Akron: +0.42 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs App State: +0.04 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsElonW47-1311363.3222800.41
2@NevadaW37-24-16.4271013.7221600.07
3vsTulsaW54-51-10.7191397.311300.26
4@MiamiL30-5217.420794.0011100.10
7@Central MichiganW30-10-8.6231456.321600.25
8vsAkronW48-21-17.6201236.2022900.34
9@Ball StateW58-17-19.7111059.510.51
10vsNorthern IllinoisW27-17-1.4291164.031300.10
11@OhioL10-383.3691.50180-0.45
12@Bowling GreenW66-37-10.0231928.301100.38
13vsWestern MichiganW37-10-2.421944.5145700.10
14vsAkronW45-28-17.6211808.621600.42
1vsApp StateL0-343.811444.0032600.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.5%
Passing plays
5.7%
Rushing plays
48.4%
Standard downs
33.9%
Passing downs
16.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.13
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / 0.17

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.600−0.54
EPA per play · 2017 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.