Skip to content
Taulia Tagovailoa
Taulia Tagovailoa

#3Taulia Tagovailoa

QB·Maryland·2023202220217.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Taulia Tagovailoa is a 3-year Clutch Passer for Maryland. Taulia's 2023 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 469 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Taulia Tagovailoa's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
290/437 Comp/Att3377 Pass yards25 Pass TD11 INT66.4% Comp %
Rushing
18 Rush yards5 Rush TD68 Carries0.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat48
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch80
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Career trajectory:→ Stable
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.79 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Indiana (SP+ -7).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7900.79Wk 1 vs Towson: +0.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Charlotte: +0.42 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Virginia: +0.50 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Michigan State: +0.35 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Indiana: +0.79 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ohio State: +0.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Illinois: +0.20 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Northwestern: +0.06 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Penn State: +0.15 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Nebraska: +0.42 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Michigan: +0.33 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Rutgers: +0.55 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsTowsonW38-622/332603086.32810.47
2vsCharlotteW38-20-21.425/362871242.5-500.42
3vsVirginiaW42-14-10.819/303421079.5-700.50
4@Michigan StateW31-9-6.821/362233178.63710.35
5vsIndianaW44-17-7.424/343525095.01510.79
6@Ohio StateL17-3725.221/411961267.22110.13
7vsIllinoisL24-27-2.527/392662072.1-600.20
9@NorthwesternL27-33-1.330/472743143.3100.06
10vsPenn StateL15-5123.529/392862180.3-4700.15
11@NebraskaW13-100.327/402831179.62700.42
12vsMichiganL24-3131.321/312470250.2-4300.33
13@RutgersW42-243.524/313613196.0-310.55

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
61.7%
Passing plays
96.7%
Rushing plays
14.4%
Standard downs
54.6%
Passing downs
77.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.36 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.120−0.5120222023
EPA per play · 2021 — 2023 · 37 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2021Maryland
7.0
250.9
2022Maryland
5.8
206.5
2023Maryland
7.5
234.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Taulia Tagovailoa Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Maryland · Gridpex