Skip to content
Shane Buechele

#7Shane Buechele

QB·SMU·2020201911.3 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Shane Buechele is a 2-year Clutch Passer for SMU. Shane's 2019 season ranks in the 60th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 531 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Shane Buechele's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Passing
307/490 Comp/Att3930 Pass yards34 Pass TD10 INT62.7% Comp %
Rushing
105 Rush yards2 Rush TD64 Carries1.6 Yards/carry
Punting
7 Punts272 Punt yards38.9 Yards/punt44 Long2 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency60
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat35
  • Consistency83
  • Clutch71
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)60th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.70 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs South Florida (SP+ -10).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Ryan HigginsLouisiana Tech0.58613.7334.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7000.70Wk 1 vs Arkansas State: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Texas: +0.68 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Texas State: +0.45 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs TCU: +0.26 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs South Florida: +0.70 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulsa: +0.25 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Temple: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Houston: -0.02 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Memphis: +0.35 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs East Carolina: +0.67 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Navy: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Tulane: +0.26 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.25 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Arkansas StateW37-30-2.930/493600158.9300.20
2vsNorth TexasW49-27-6.121/312923094.62400.68
3vsTexas StateW47-17-16.214/182192259.9600.45
4@TCUW41-386.723/342882164.03010.26
5@South FloridaW48-21-9.821/252263197.22710.70
6vsTulsaW43-37-2.523/402802057.5-1500.25
8vsTempleW45-213.230/534576180.7-400.49
9@HoustonW34-31-4.320/382032140.1-60-0.02
10@MemphisL48-5418.034/5445630-1300.35
11vsEast CarolinaW59-51-14.033/46414511100.67
13@NavyL28-359.916/28251202200.27
14vsTulaneW37-207.515/27180312000.26
1@Florida AtlanticL28-52-0.627/4730411000.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.5%
Passing plays
97.5%
Rushing plays
9.4%
Standard downs
41.9%
Passing downs
75.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.43
Pass / Rush EPA
0.37 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.830−0.172020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019SMU
11.3
307.0
2020SMU
8.4
203.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.