Skip to content
Seydou Traore

#8Seydou Traore

Seydou Traore is a Versatile TE for Mississippi State. Seydou's 2025 season produced 28.8 total EPA across 47 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Seydou Traore's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
35 Receptions372 Rec yards5 Rec TD10.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume17
  • Explosiveness24
  • Consistency65
  • Pass-Down56
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency65th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.26 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.89 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Tennessee (SP+ 15).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Ty ThompsonTulane0.4200.720.2
Seth GreenMinnesota0.3900.032.4
Johnny LanganRutgers0.3000.017.7
Evan SvobodaWyoming0.2900.521.8
Jordan MyersRice0.2700.215.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8901.89Wk 1 vs Southern Miss: +1.49 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Northern Illinois: +1.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Tennessee: +1.89 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Texas A&M: -0.45 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Florida: -0.02 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas: +0.71 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas: -0.59 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia: +0.49 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Missouri: +0.75 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Ole Miss: +1.53 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@Southern MissW34-17-7.157715.41551.49
4vsNorthern IllinoisW38-10-16.7111.0111.13
5vsTennesseeL34-4115.044010.01161.89
6@Texas A&ML9-3120.7199.009-0.45
8@FloridaL21-233.523618.0029-0.02
9vsTexasL38-4516.266010.01150.71
10@ArkansasW38-355.1393.004-0.59
11vsGeorgiaL21-4124.15336.60100.49
12@MissouriL27-4914.43299.71180.75
14vsOle MissL19-3824.046716.80291.53
20vsWake ForestL29-435.711111.0011

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.8%
Passing plays
12.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.2%
Passing downs
7.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.60
Passing downs
0.64
Pass / Rush EPA
0.61 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.