Skip to content
Sean Dollars

#4Sean Dollars

Sean Dollars is a Pass-Catching Back for Nevada. Sean's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 53 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sean Dollars's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
165 Rush yards0 Rush TD47 Carries3.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions74 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.7 Yards/rec
Returns
4 Kick returns29 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume34
  • Explosiveness10
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving83
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.35 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.61 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Minnesota (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7300.73Wk 1 vs Troy: -0.25 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Minnesota: +0.61 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Eastern Washington: +0.32 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs Oregon State: -0.04 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Fresno State: -0.73 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Colorado State: +0.54 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Boise State: -0.25 EPA/play11
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsSMUL24-2917.511393.502110
1@TroyW28-26-6.6420.50210-0.25
3@MinnesotaL0-2710.44133.3011200.61
4vsEastern WashingtonW49-163134.300.32
6@San José StateL31-35-5.5
7vsOregon StateW42-37-6.7144.00-0.04
8vsFresno StateL21-24-3.81-1-1.00-0.73
9@Hawai'iL13-34-10.9
10vsColorado StateL21-38-5.78577.1033400.54
11@Boise StateL21-2810.115382.503160-0.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.9%
Passing plays
5.4%
Rushing plays
16.6%
Standard downs
12.8%
Passing downs
9.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.16
Passing downs
0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / -0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.