#22Ramone Green Jr.

RB·Missouri State·2025

Ramone Green Jr. is a Pass-Catching Back for Missouri State. Ramone's 2025 season ranks in the 98th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 86 plays — a elite rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ramone Green Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

278 Rush yards1 Rush TD52 Carries5.3 Yards/carry

Receiving

29 Receptions446 Rec yards3 Rec TD15.4 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency98
Volume29
Explosiveness46
Consistency61
Receiving100

Player type

Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite

Game-to-game consistency61th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
▸7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 1.67 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Marshall (SP+ -5).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Travis Etienne	Clemson	2019	213	0.470	4.7	100.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	@USC	L13-73	16.9	4	19	4.8	0	2	28	0	0.58
2	@Marshall	W21-20	-4.5	2	10	5.0	0	4	123	1	1.67
3	vsSMU	L10-28	13.4	4	5	1.3	0	3	13	0	-0.42
4	vsUT Martin	W42-10	—	2	11	5.5	0	2	12	0	0.06
5	vsWestern Kentucky	L22-27	1.6	6	57	9.5	0	1	3	0	-0.07
7	@Middle Tennessee	W22-20	-16.0	3	3	1.0	0	1	76	0	1.27
9	@New Mexico State	W24-17	-15.5	6	51	8.5	0	6	61	1	0.55
10	vsFlorida International	W28-21	-10.5	4	18	4.5	0	1	5	0	-0.23
11	@Liberty	W21-17	-9.0	2	15	7.5	0	2	40	0	1.04
12	vsUTEP	W38-24	-17.5	3	4	1.3	0	2	16	0	-0.02
13	@Kennesaw State	L34-41	-5.4	5	25	5.0	0	2	44	0	0.61
14	vsLouisiana Tech	L30-42	-1.3	5	38	7.6	1	—	—	—	0.59
20	vsArkansas State	L28-34	-8.8	6	22	3.7	0	3	25	1	—

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

10.0%

Passing plays

7.8%

Rushing plays

13.2%

Standard downs

9.6%

Passing downs

10.8%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.16
Passing downs: 0.84
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.88 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).