Skip to content
Ralph Webb

#7Ralph Webb

RB·Vanderbilt·20161.4 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Ralph Webb is a Featured Back for Vanderbilt. Ralph's 2016 season ranks in the 3th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 279 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ralph Webb's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
1283 Rush yards13 Rush TD250 Carries5.1 Yards/carry
Receiving
21 Receptions166 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.9 Yards/rec
Returns
2 Kick returns49 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency3
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness42
  • Consistency48
  • Receiving44
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)3th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency48th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 8 vs Tennessee State.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5500.55Wk 1 vs South Carolina: +0.23 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Middle Tennessee: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Tech: -0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Western Kentucky: +0.04 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Florida: -0.09 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kentucky: -0.08 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Georgia: +0.03 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee State: +0.55 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Auburn: -0.22 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Missouri: +0.00 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Ole Miss: +0.41 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Tennessee: +0.32 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs NC State: +0.15 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsSouth CarolinaL10-13-4.020974.8032800.23
2vsMiddle TennesseeW47-24-1.9292117.321-500.32
3@Georgia TechL7-387.818693.802150-0.04
4@Western KentuckyW31-3015.527953.532400.04
5vsFloridaL6-1315.4241104.602170-0.09
6@KentuckyL13-20-2.6181005.60150-0.08
7@GeorgiaW17-169.319482.5124400.03
8vsTennessee StateW35-17912513.9011500.55
10@AuburnL16-2315.313463.50230-0.22
11@MissouriL17-26-1.011343.111600.00
12vsOle MissW38-1712.4201236.230.41
13vsTennesseeW45-3416.3211145.4222100.32
1vsNC StateL17-419.4211115.3121300.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.2%
Passing plays
7.6%
Rushing plays
53.5%
Standard downs
32.9%
Passing downs
27.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.12
Passing downs
0.16
Pass / Rush EPA
0.17 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.630−0.30
EPA per play · 2016 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.