Skip to content
Patrick Mahomes

#5Patrick Mahomes

QB·Texas Tech·2016201517.5 pts line value1st Round

Patrick Mahomes is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Texas Tech. Patrick's 2016 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 681 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Patrick Mahomes's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Passing
388/591 Comp/Att5052 Pass yards41 Pass TD10 INT65.7% Comp %
Rushing
285 Rush yards12 Rush TD131 Carries2.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat99
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.22 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.92 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech (SP+ 3).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Lamar JacksonLouisville0.57616.8384.9
Caleb WilliamsUSC0.62017.0415.9
Dwayne HaskinsOhio State0.64317.5419.0
Lamar JacksonLouisville0.54316.1387.6
Deshaun WatsonClemson0.58416.2418.1

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9200.92Wk 1 vs Stephen F. Austin: +0.75 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arizona State: +0.57 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.92 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Kansas: +0.55 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kansas State: +0.31 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs West Virginia: +0.06 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Oklahoma: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs TCU: +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Texas: +0.14 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Oklahoma State: +0.45 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Iowa State: -0.13 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Baylor: +0.75 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsStephen F. AustinW69-1730/434834093.25720.75
2@Arizona StateL55-68-3.038/535405282.54410.57
3vsLouisiana TechW59-453.126/364705096.63710.92
5vsKansasW55-19-15.927/342774175.62700.55
6@Kansas StateL38-448.245/625042178.6-330.31
7vsWest VirginiaL17-4811.328/443051147.1-1000.06
8vsOklahomaL59-6626.152/887345189.18520.51
9@TCUW27-2411.024/392062177.33910.15
10vsTexasL37-4510.636/593673139.9-1600.14
11@Oklahoma StateL44-4516.434/513613083.93320.45
12@Iowa StateL10-660.718/362191234.4-20-0.13
13vsBaylorW54-3511.330/465866094.9-600.75

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
68.2%
Passing plays
90.1%
Rushing plays
29.9%
Standard downs
63.9%
Passing downs
77.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.26
Passing downs
0.72
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.40

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.020−0.232016
EPA per play · 2015 — 2016 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2015Texas Tech
15.0
378.4
2016Texas Tech
17.5
390.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.