Skip to content
Najee Harris

#22Najee Harris

RB·Alabama·202020193.7 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Najee Harris is a 2-year Featured Back for Alabama. Najee's 2019 season ranks in the 75th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 224 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Najee Harris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2019 Production

Rushing
1224 Rush yards13 Rush TD209 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions304 Rec yards7 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency75
  • Volume81
  • Explosiveness58
  • Consistency78
  • Receiving52
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)75th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (75th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.19 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.67 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs South Carolina (SP+ 5).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.6700.67Wk 1 vs Duke: -0.15 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs New Mexico State: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs South Carolina: +0.67 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Southern Miss: +0.56 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: -0.12 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Texas A&M: +0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: +0.40 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Arkansas: +0.56 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs LSU: +0.48 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Mississippi State: +0.54 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Carolina: +0.39 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Auburn: +0.24 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Michigan: +0.31 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsDukeW42-3-1.812524.30-0.15
2vsNew Mexico StateW62-10-22.012685.7111200.35
3@South CarolinaW47-234.87365.1058720.67
4vsSouthern MissW49-7-4.8141107.901510.56
5vsOle MissW59-312.99717.90200-0.12
7@Texas A&MW47-2815.0201145.7031910.09
8vsTennesseeW35-1310.8211055.0244800.40
9vsArkansasW48-7-10.613866.620.56
11vsLSUL41-4633.1191467.7134410.48
12@Mississippi StateW38-73.517885.2335110.54
13vsWestern CarolinaW66-314664.7111210.39
14@AuburnL45-4821.0271465.4142600.24
1vsMichiganW35-1620.7241365.720.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.5%
Passing plays
8.1%
Rushing plays
49.5%
Standard downs
32.2%
Passing downs
18.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.750−0.232020
EPA per play · 2019 — 2020 · 26 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Alabama
3.7
77.0
2020Alabama
5.9
121.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.