Skip to content
McKenzie Milton

#10McKenzie Milton

QB·UCF·2018201714.7 pts line value1st Round

McKenzie Milton is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for UCF. McKenzie's 2017 season ranks in the 85th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 487 plays — a above-average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So McKenzie Milton's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
265/395 Comp/Att4037 Pass yards37 Pass TD9 INT67.1% Comp %
Rushing
613 Rush yards8 Rush TD106 Carries5.8 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency85
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency88
  • Clutch80
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)85th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the QB position (85th percentile).
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.17 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.17 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Cincinnati (SP+ -6).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Malik CunninghamLouisville0.68114.7341.6
Tanner MordecaiSMU0.63014.0321.5
Kaidon SalterLiberty0.71114.7345.6
Blake SimsAlabama0.69615.4329.4
Dillon GabrielOklahoma0.73216.1346.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1701.17Wk 1 vs Florida International: +1.07 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Maryland: +0.39 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Memphis: +0.38 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Cincinnati: +1.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs East Carolina: +0.66 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Navy: +0.47 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Austin Peay: +0.72 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs SMU: +0.38 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UConn: +0.46 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Temple: +0.75 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Florida: +0.48 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Memphis: +0.60 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Auburn: +0.47 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida InternationalW61-17-10.416/213604193.2401.07
4@MarylandW38-10-4.518/301781084.09400.39
5vsMemphisW40-137.819/312533171.98800.38
6@CincinnatiW51-23-6.416/193745099.2601.17
7vsEast CarolinaW63-21-14.021/273242089.4610.66
8@NavyW31-21-0.715/232331177.94700.47
9vsAustin PeayW73-3324/262753095.7910.72
10@SMUW31-24-2.923/404121267.74410.38
11vsUConnW49-24-19.224/363112086.65210.46
12@TempleW45-190.516/232084092.22310.75
13vsSouth FloridaW49-4210.229/443734172.45610.48
14vsMemphisW62-557.828/404945391.66810.60
1vsAuburnW34-2724.716/352422088.711610.47

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
53.2%
Passing plays
92.4%
Rushing plays
19.7%
Standard downs
48.3%
Passing downs
65.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.49
Passing downs
0.69
Pass / Rush EPA
0.56 / 0.56

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.280−0.002018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 23 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017UCF
14.7
317.5
2018UCF
9.7
222.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.