Skip to content
Marcus Cox

#14Marcus Cox

RB·App State·20142.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Marcus Cox is a Featured Back for App State. Marcus's 2014 season ranks in the 23th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 257 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Marcus Cox's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Rushing
1415 Rush yards19 Rush TD255 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions180 Rec yards0 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency23
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness50
  • Consistency69
  • Receiving40
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)23th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency69th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.26 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Georgia State (SP+ -23).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5500.55Wk 1 vs Michigan: +0.27 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Campbell: +0.32 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Southern Miss: +0.21 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Georgia Southern: -0.03 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs South Alabama: -0.14 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Liberty: -0.10 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Troy: +0.51 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Georgia State: +0.55 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UL Monroe: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arkansas State: +0.44 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Louisiana: -0.01 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Idaho: +0.26 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@MichiganL14-528.211474.310.27
2vsCampbellW66-0201145.7211200.32
4@Southern MissL20-21-15.9221195.412700.21
5@Georgia SouthernL14-34-2.410393.913240-0.03
6vsSouth AlabamaL21-47-4.38162.001230-0.14
7vsLibertyL48-55171116.51-0.10
8@TroyW53-14-15.9161237.730.51
10vsGeorgia StateW44-0-22.8292508.632400.55
11vsUL MonroeW31-29-10.021944.5155600.34
12@Arkansas StateW37-32-0.3402295.7225400.44
13@LouisianaW35-162.2361514.22-0.01
14vsIdahoW45-28-17.4251224.920.26

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.3%
Passing plays
6.9%
Rushing plays
48.2%
Standard downs
36.1%
Passing downs
20.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.30 / 0.20

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.620−0.21
EPA per play · 2014 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.