Skip to content
La'Damian Webb

#3La'Damian Webb

RB·South Alabama·20233.0 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

La'Damian Webb is a Featured Back for South Alabama. La'Damian's 2023 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 201 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So La'Damian Webb's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
1007 Rush yards16 Rush TD186 Carries5.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
24 Receptions144 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume80
  • Explosiveness48
  • Consistency68
  • Receiving43
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.10 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.27 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs SE Louisiana.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.2701.27Wk 1 vs Tulane: -0.08 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SE Louisiana: +1.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Oklahoma State: +0.56 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Central Michigan: +0.36 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs James Madison: -0.12 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UL Monroe: +0.38 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Southern Miss: +0.62 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisiana: +0.45 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Troy: +0.07 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arkansas State: +0.26 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Marshall: +0.10 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@TulaneL17-372.89404.40110-0.08
2vsSE LouisianaW35-1778111.621.27
3@Oklahoma StateW33-76.7181518.420.56
4vsCentral MichiganL30-34-19.118683.8211900.36
5@James MadisonL23-3111.812363.017240-0.12
6@UL MonroeW55-7-21.6191005.3132200.38
8vsSouthern MissW55-3-14.4201025.1422600.62
9vsLouisianaL20-330.416966.0131400.45
10@TroyL10-289.815533.511200.07
11vsArkansas StateW21-14-6.3281635.8143200.26
12vsMarshallW28-0-9.0241174.912410.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
28.1%
Passing plays
6.6%
Rushing plays
48.8%
Standard downs
33.1%
Passing downs
18.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
0.62 / 0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.410−0.26
EPA per play · 2023 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.