Skip to content
Kyle Vantrease

#6Kyle Vantrease

QB·Georgia Southern·20226.7 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Kyle Vantrease is a Dual-Threat QB for Georgia Southern. Kyle's 2022 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 613 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kyle Vantrease's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Passing
370/603 Comp/Att4246 Pass yards27 Pass TD16 INT61.4% Comp %
Rushing
34 Rush yards3 Rush TD33 Carries1.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency85
  • Clutch88
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency85th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.08 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.55 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Morgan State.

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5500.55Wk 1 vs Morgan State: +0.55 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Nebraska: +0.49 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UAB: +0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Ball State: +0.33 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Georgia State: +0.34 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs James Madison: +0.46 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Old Dominion: +0.49 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs South Alabama: +0.26 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Louisiana: +0.25 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Marshall: -0.06 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs App State: +0.36 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Buffalo: +0.38 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsMorgan StateW59-729/463674146.8400.55
2@NebraskaW45-42-1.237/564091280.4710.49
3@UABL21-35-0.524/502041330.62400.04
4vsBall StateW34-23-14.926/393102074.01510.33
5@Coastal CarolinaL30-340.626/432842166.3-700.43
6@Georgia StateL33-41-3.330/493573455.2-200.34
7vsJames MadisonW45-386.538/645784175.3-200.46
8@Old DominionW28-23-13.022/271921075.0300.49
10vsSouth AlabamaL31-3810.826/452782164.4-400.26
11@LouisianaL17-362.028/493251056.8-1600.25
12vsMarshallL10-233.022/392051139.3-140-0.06
13vsApp StateW51-481.734/513853177.41710.36
1vsBuffaloL21-23-9.228/4535221900.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
63.3%
Passing plays
98.3%
Rushing plays
7.7%
Standard downs
56.3%
Passing downs
80.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.23
Passing downs
0.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.33 / 0.41

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.610−0.12
EPA per play · 2022 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.