Skip to content
Keaton Mitchell

#2Keaton Mitchell

RB·East Carolina·20223.5 pts line value

Keaton Mitchell is a Featured Back for East Carolina. Keaton's 2022 season ranks in the 63th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 222 plays — a average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Keaton Mitchell's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2022 Production

Rushing
1452 Rush yards14 Rush TD201 Carries7.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
27 Receptions252 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.3 Yards/rec
Returns
5 Kick returns133 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2022 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency63
  • Volume78
  • Explosiveness84
  • Consistency56
  • Receiving40
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)63th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency56th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.14 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Campbell.

NIL Market Tier· 2022

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
James FlandersTulsa0.3904.9103.7
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Hassan HaskinsMichigan0.3804.8106.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9400.94Wk 1 vs NC State: -0.03 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Old Dominion: +0.39 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Campbell: +0.94 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Navy: -0.62 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Tulane: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Memphis: +0.26 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UCF: +0.23 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs BYU: +0.29 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Cincinnati: +0.35 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Houston: +0.39 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Temple: +0.68 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.00 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNC StateL20-216.810363.603370-0.03
2vsOld DominionW39-21-13.0181608.920.39
3vsCampbellW49-101318514.210.94
4vsNavyL20-23-7.2551.00-0.62
6@TulaneL9-2412.410474.7085400.17
7vsMemphisW47-456.8291495.1342800.26
8vsUCFW34-1310.3161056.623900.23
9@BYUW27-24-1.4211768.411800.29
11@CincinnatiL25-2713.1161127.0121500.35
12vsHoustonL3-424.5141289.102800.39
13@TempleW49-46-12.9272228.2327810.68
1vsCoastal CarolinaW53-290.6221275.8121500.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.3%
Passing plays
6.0%
Rushing plays
53.1%
Standard downs
32.3%
Passing downs
17.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.30
Passing downs
0.23
Pass / Rush EPA
0.54 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.100−0.78
EPA per play · 2022 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.