Scores
Dev
← Player leaders
Kaelon Black

#8Kaelon Black

Kaelon Black is a Explosive Back for Indiana. Kaelon's 2024 season produced 5.5 total EPA across 30 plays.

2024 Production

Rushing
251 Rush yards2 Rush TD46 Carries5.5 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions6 Rec yards0 Rec TD1.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

EfficiencyVolumeExplosivenessConsistencyReceiving
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency47th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.76 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Northwestern (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

Wk 1 vs Florida International: +0.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Western Illinois: +0.27 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UCLA: -0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Charlotte: +0.36 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Maryland: -0.43 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Northwestern: +0.76 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Nebraska: +0.60 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Washington: -0.03 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Michigan State: +0.19 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Michigan: -0.15 EPA/play11Wk 14 vs Purdue: +0.08 EPA/play14
EPA per play, by weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFlorida InternationalW31-7-12.1177.000.48
2vsWestern IllinoisW77-35306.000.27
3@UCLAW42-13-1.35214.20-0.04
4vsCharlotteW52-14-15.37557.910.36
5vsMarylandW42-28-3.93175.70270-0.43
6vsNorthwesternW41-24-8.25336.600.76
8vsNebraskaW56-75.54225.510.60
9vsWashingtonW31-173.13134.30130-0.03
10@Michigan StateW47-10-4.66193.200.19
11vsMichiganW20-1510.61-40-0.15
14vsPurdueW66-0-16.27344.900.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
6.9%
Passing plays
1.3%
Rushing plays
11.3%
Standard downs
7.4%
Passing downs
5.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.01
Passing downs
0.65
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / 0.18

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.