Skip to content
Johnny Jefferson
Johnny Jefferson

#5Johnny Jefferson

RB·Baylor·20152.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Johnny Jefferson is a Explosive Back for Baylor. Johnny's 2015 season ranks in the 78th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 116 plays — a above-average rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Johnny Jefferson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
1000 Rush yards8 Rush TD136 Carries7.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions17 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.3 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns24 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency78
  • Volume43
  • Explosiveness88
  • Consistency55
  • Receiving33
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)78th %ile · above avg
Game-to-game consistency55th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (78th percentile).
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.43 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.45 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs SMU (SP+ -18).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Travis EtienneClemson0.4704.7100.1
Clyde Edwards-HelaireLSU0.4905.0105.8
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.4105.298.4
Nick WilsonArizona0.4105.2102.5
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.4505.8102.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4501.45Wk 1 vs SMU: +1.45 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Lamar: +0.55 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Rice: +1.00 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Texas Tech: +0.14 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kansas: +0.28 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs West Virginia: -0.47 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Iowa State: -0.28 EPA/play8Wk 12 vs Oklahoma State: -0.07 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs TCU: +0.23 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Texas: +0.28 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs North Carolina: +1.08 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@SMUW56-21-17.522814.001.45
2vsLamarW66-311212110.110.55
4vsRiceW70-17-14.69869.6111101.00
5vsTexas TechW63-354.512393.310.14
6@KansasW66-7-21.315795.312200.28
7vsWest VirginiaW62-3812.97192.70-0.47
8vsIowa StateW45-27-0.34276.80-0.28
12@Oklahoma StateW45-359.917623.60-0.07
13@TCUL21-2819.012826.800.23
14vsTexasL17-233.7231586.911400.28
1vsNorth CarolinaW49-3820.02329913.031.08

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.9%
Passing plays
2.7%
Rushing plays
21.7%
Standard downs
15.5%
Passing downs
13.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
0.05 / 0.46

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.640−0.67
EPA per play · 2015 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.