Skip to content
Joey Aguilar

#6Joey Aguilar

QB·App State·202520238.2 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Joey Aguilar is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for App State. Joey's 2023 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 514 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Joey Aguilar's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
292/459 Comp/Att3754 Pass yards33 Pass TD10 INT63.6% Comp %
Rushing
249 Rush yards3 Rush TD81 Carries3.1 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat83
  • Consistency87
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency87th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Gardner-Webb.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Gardner-Webb: +0.95 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Carolina: +0.52 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs East Carolina: +0.55 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wyoming: +0.27 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UL Monroe: +0.51 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.30 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Old Dominion: +0.45 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Southern Miss: +0.77 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Marshall: +0.57 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Georgia State: +0.72 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs James Madison: +0.27 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Georgia Southern: +0.39 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Troy: +0.17 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsGardner-WebbW45-2411/131744096.3800.95
2@North CarolinaL34-407.422/432752171.44200.52
3vsEast CarolinaW43-28-12.817/292413135.21310.55
4@WyomingL19-22-3.622/402000161.62000.27
5@UL MonroeW41-40-21.627/393353261.54900.51
7vsCoastal CarolinaL24-27-1.218/313052074.3600.30
8@Old DominionL21-28-10.122/312522075.81810.45
9vsSouthern MissW48-38-14.423/333914170.94300.77
10vsMarshallW31-9-9.019/262263088.54400.57
11@Georgia StateW42-14-6.814/212553182.82000.72
12@James MadisonW26-2311.828/463183180.1000.27
13vsGeorgia SouthernW55-27-5.223/362964181.41100.39
14@TroyL23-499.828/392750061.7-3900.17
20vsMiami (OH)W13-92.818/322110172.7141

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.7%
Passing plays
97.0%
Rushing plays
12.9%
Standard downs
47.1%
Passing downs
65.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.73
Pass / Rush EPA
0.46 / 0.31

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.040−0.132025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023App State
8.2
259.8
2025Tennessee
8.4
199.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.