Skip to content
Jahad Thomas

#5Jahad Thomas

RB·Temple·20152.5 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Jahad Thomas is a Featured Back for Temple. Jahad's 2015 season ranks in the 10th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 304 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jahad Thomas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2015 Production

Rushing
1262 Rush yards17 Rush TD276 Carries4.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions216 Rec yards1 Rec TD9.8 Yards/rec
Returns
6 Kick returns199 KR yards1 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2015 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency10
  • Volume89
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving39
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)10th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used RBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.25 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.52 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Tulane (SP+ -14).

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9
Donnel PumphreySan Diego State0.3204.2110.1
Dalvin CookFlorida State0.3404.399.3
Breece HallIowa State0.3404.5102.3
Eno BenjaminArizona State0.3304.6104.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5700.57Wk 1 vs Penn State: +0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cincinnati: -0.01 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Massachusetts: -0.26 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Charlotte: +0.51 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Tulane: +0.52 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UCF: +0.21 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs East Carolina: +0.20 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Notre Dame: -0.13 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs SMU: +0.02 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs South Florida: -0.02 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Memphis: -0.57 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs UConn: +0.28 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Houston: -0.03 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Toledo: -0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsPenn StateW27-1011.3291354.720.02
2@CincinnatiW34-265.3261937.412170-0.01
3@MassachusettsW25-23-9.525662.615670-0.26
5@CharlotteW37-3-21.7201095.4234800.51
6vsTulaneW49-10-14.014543.9122410.52
7vsUCFW30-16-15.5311996.4332500.21
8@East CarolinaW24-14-0.520663.3232300.20
9vsNotre DameL20-2422.421823.91-0.13
10@SMUW60-40-17.515664.412000.02
11@South FloridaL23-443.616654.11-0.02
12vsMemphisW31-128.012342.80-0.57
13vsUConnW27-3-6.3201195.921600.28
14@HoustonL13-246.219693.60160-0.03
1vsToledoL17-327.7850.60-0.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.2%
Passing plays
6.7%
Rushing plays
54.6%
Standard downs
37.4%
Passing downs
20.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.07
Passing downs
0.45
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.630−0.68
EPA per play · 2015 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.