Skip to content
Ja'Quinden Jackson
Ja'Quinden Jackson

#22Ja'Quinden Jackson

Ja'Quinden Jackson is a Committee Back for Utah. Ja'Quinden's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 155 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ja'Quinden Jackson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
797 Rush yards4 Rush TD161 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
9 Receptions53 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume57
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency26
  • Receiving36
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency26th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.49 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Weber State.

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · RB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Saquon BarkleyPenn State0.3403.997.9

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4900.49Wk 1 vs Florida: -0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Baylor: +0.29 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Weber State: +0.49 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UCLA: -0.10 EPA/play4Wk 7 vs California: +0.09 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs USC: -0.17 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Oregon: -0.19 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona State: +0.25 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Washington: +0.41 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arizona: +0.19 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Colorado: -0.02 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsFloridaW24-116.85153.00-0.20
2@BaylorW20-13-8.3191296.8011100.29
3vsWeber StateW31-79697.701600.49
4vsUCLAW14-79.76264.30-0.10
7vsCaliforniaW34-14-0.122944.311300.09
8@USCW34-329.4261174.50110-0.17
9vsOregonL6-3526.212373.10-0.19
10vsArizona StateW55-3-11.3131118.510.25
11@WashingtonL28-3516.410292.922800.41
12@ArizonaL18-4214.110474.7032400.19
13vsColoradoW23-17-4.921683.20-0.02
20vsNorthwesternL7-14-1.38556.90

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.9%
Passing plays
3.9%
Rushing plays
30.0%
Standard downs
23.4%
Passing downs
11.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.29
Pass / Rush EPA
0.17 / 0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.210−0.10
EPA per play · 2024 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Ja Quinden Jackson Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Utah · Gridpex