Skip to content

Utah Utes

Big 12·1-0·
Elo
1817#15
SP+
13.0#21
FPI
11.2
AP
#20
Nextvs Arkansas · Wk 2Win prob 79%Model -12.2
Talent #58 (695.7)Recruiting class #2768% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Utah

All news

Arkansas's defense holds everywhere except over the top

Matchup · 4d ago

Utah Threw Deep All Night. The 66 Points Came From Everything Else

Matchup · Sep 4

Roster · 112 players

FR 30SO 35JR 19SR 28
#PlayerPosClHtWt
4Devon DampierQBSR5'11"210
9Kane ArcherQBFR6'1"200
13Michael JohnsonQBFR6'0"175
14Brandon RoseQBSR6'2"212
15Byrd FicklinQBSO6'1"200
1Wayshawn ParkerRBJR5'10"205
3Nate JohnsonRBSR6'1"200
5Daniel BrayRBSO5'10"180
20Mateaki HeluRBSO6'1"224
25Steve Chavez-SotoRBSO6'0"205
26LaMarcus BellRBFR6'0"200
28Anthony HernandezRBJR5'10"192
84Jojo WardRBFR6'2"225
0Kyri ShoelsWRSR6'0"182
2Creed WhittemoreWRSR5'11"182
6Daidren ZippererWRSR6'0"175
7Braden PeganWRSR6'3"210
8Mana CarvalhoWRSO5'9"175
11Ricky JohnsonWRSO6'2"185
12Larry SimmonsWRSR6'1"190
18Tobias MerriweatherWRSR6'5"200
30Matt ClarkWRJR5'11"181
37Peyton RiceWRSR5'10"180
39Junior CoughlinWRSO6'0"176
80Bryson BakerWRSO6'1"185
82Max AusmusWRSO6'1"185
10Hunter AndrewsTEJR6'3"230
33Kana'i LopesTEJR6'3"228
44Sione MotuapuakaTESO5'11"276
46Teague MatthewsTEFR6'6"240
81Bear FisherTEFR6'5"240
85Broderick ReddenTESO6'4"233
86Will MonneyTEJR6'4"230
89Noah BenneeTESR6'4"240
99Semi TaulangaTESO5'11"317
54Milz AsiataOLFR6'5"331
55Kelvin ObotOLFR6'5"295
56Isaiah KemaOLFR6'3"312
57Moses SparksOLFR6'4"305
61Cyrus NielsenOLFR6'5"315
62Solatoa Moea'iOLSR6'4"325
63Devin EntsmingerOLFR6'4"300
64Reece ParmenterOLJR6'5"319
66Will FryOLFR6'4"315
67Soren ShinofieldOLSO6'6"304
70Mataalii BenjaminOLFR6'7"340
71Rowdy PearceOLFR6'3"295
72Isaiah GarciaOLJR6'5"310
73Cedric JeffersonOLJR6'5"300
74Keith OlsonOLSR6'6"307
75Roger AldermanOLSR6'4"302
76Zereoue WilliamsOLSR6'8"305
77Nick HallockOLSO6'4"275
79Alex HarrisonOLSR6'5"309
8Ethan DayDEJR6'4"250
15Lance HoltzclawDESR6'3"245
16PJ TakitakiDEFR6'3"223
40Paul FitzgeraldDESR6'4"256
46Mauka BernardDEFR6'4"215
47Jared FredrickDEFR6'3"220
48Alex ClowardDEFR6'3"247
58Fameitau SialeDEFR6'3"265
92Nicholas IgweDESO6'4"255
93Kash DillonDEJR6'5"252
45Pupu SepulonaDTSO6'2"298
51Karson KaufusiDTSO6'6"305
57Stanley RaassDTFR6'0"290
90Jireh MoeDTSO6'0"280
94Mike TauteoliDTJR6'4"300
96Dilan BattleDTSO6'2"320
97Lucas SamsulaDTSO6'4"306
99Jamal WallaceDTSR6'3"313
0Cyrus PoluLBSO6'1"225
7Johnathan HallLBSR6'1"226
10Trey ReynoldsLBSR6'1"231
35Preston PittsLBFR6'4"225
41LaGary MitchellLBFR6'2"212
43Grady MarekoLBJR6'1"231
53Brock FonoimoanaLBSO6'1"200
53Jed JudkinsLBFR6'2"215
54Tayson ReidLBSO6'0"230
83Elijah EllissLBJR6'2"225
2Rock CaldwellCBSR6'3"190
4JC HartCBSR6'2"202
5James Chenault Jr.CBJR6'0"180
9Elijah DavisCBSR6'0"185
11Elijah ReedCBSR6'3"200
13Nick BrownCBSO6'0"170
13Nick BrownCBSO6'0"170
18Earl ParkerCBJR6'2"186
19Dylan WatersCBFR6'0"185
20King LongCBFR5'9"180
27Brandon HolmesCBSO6'1"180
29Major HinchenCBFR6'2"175
1Rabbit EvansSSR6'1"205
6Nate RitchieSSR6'2"207
12Davis AndrewsSFR6'3"200
14Cole StandageSSO6'2"200
21Nate TilmonSSO6'1"196
23Jackson BenneeSJR6'2"190
24Marcus WimberlySFR6'1"185
25Manny FullerSSO6'0"190
28Luke BryantSFR6'2"200
31Jack EvansSSO6'0"192
32Josh SovereignSSO5'11"198
34Ashton OlevaoSSO6'0"200
38Tommy NelsonSSO6'3"193
17Dillon CurtisPKSO6'2"190
88Tanner CragunPKJR6'2"205
92Orion PhillipsPJR6'3"180
65Logan CastorLSSR6'6"240
69Gage VictorLSSO6'1"215

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
66.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
14.0
scoring defense
Differential
+52.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
633.0#6
Yards / play
8.4#12
Passing yards / game
269.0#48
Rushing yards / game
364.0#4
First downs / game
33.0#4
3rd down %
66.7%#6
4th down %
50.0%#67
Time of possession
34:20#22
Defense
Yards allowed / game
225.0#33
Yards / play allowed
3.7#22
Pass yards allowed / game
119.0#20
Rush yards allowed / game
106.0#63
3rd down % allowed
23.1%#21
Sacks
1#104
Tackles for loss
4#114
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+2#22
Takeaways
2#53
Giveaways
0#1
Penalties / game
1.0#1
Penalty yards / game
10.0#1

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

Utah is in year 1 under Morgan Scalley. The strengths are offensive, led by 1st at running it. The way in is 125th at keeping everything in front of them.

Utah has not played an FBS opponent yet, so this is the projection: last season regressed toward the mean, plus returning production, recruiting, talent and whether the staff is the same one.

Projected strengths

  • Offenserunning it
    #1
    projected
  • Offensethe push the line gets
    #1
    projected
  • Offenseturning trips inside the 40 into points
    #3
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #125
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 11 to play
8.73.3
projected final record (now 10)
Exp. wins left
7.7
of 11 games
Bowl odds
99%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
91%
vs West Virginia
Toughest
37%
vs BYU

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 11 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

123456789101112
final winstallest bar = 28% chance
Likeliest finish 9-3 (28%)Bowl eligible 99% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBDevon Dampier, Byrd Ficklin
+15.5 EPA
RBWayshawn Parker, Daniel Bray
+10.9 EPA
WRLarry Simmons, Braden Pegan +2
+8.6 EPA
TEHunter Andrews
+1.6 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +15.10.654/play23 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.4786th#20
Def0.1826th#102
Explosiveness
Off1.2955th#63
Def1.3528th#99
Field position
Off59.51st#136
Def77.611th#123
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off6.0093rd#11
Def4.6714th#119
Turnovers
Won 2Lost 0
Margin +2

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.7090th#15
Off · rush
0.3682nd#26

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.3682nd#26
Def0.317th#129
Passing
Off0.7090th#15
Def0.0181st#27

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.98#16
2nd-level / open-field
1.68 / 0.96
Power / stuff (off)
100.0% / 16.0%
Havoc — total (def)
12.9%#107
Havoc — front 7 / DB
8.1% / 4.8%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.25
Def0.01
Pass downs
Off1.36
Def0.38

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.20#430.58#221.28#9
Defense-0.16#430.42#1160.29#60

Elo Trajectory

IdahoFinal
Elo rating 18171817+0 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 31 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.5185th
  • Defense EPA/play allowed0.1435th
  • Offense success rate57%84th
  • Defense success rate allowed34%60th

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs53%59th
  • Offense success — passing downs73%99th
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs40%61st
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs26%53rd

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.476th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.340th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.278th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.941st

Trenches

  • Offense line yards4.191st
  • Defense line yards allowed2.371st
  • Offense highlight yards2.181st
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.8342nd
  • Offense power success0.7550th
  • Defense power success allowed1.023rd
  • Offense stuff rate0.1459th
  • Defense stuff rate0.2050th

Third down

  • Third down conversion67%96th
  • Third down distance faced4.694th
  • Third down conversion allowed23%79th
  • Third down distance forced8.880th

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.2674th
  • Net success rate — second half0.2174th

Roster

  • Returning usage72%87th
  • Returning EPA27993rd
  • Team talent composite69658th
  • Recruiting class rank27.081st
  • Recruiting class points22781st

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Pass-dominant offense performing above the national average
EPA/play
+0.472#20 · top 20%
Pass EPA/play
+0.703#15
Rush EPA/play
+0.359#26
Explosiveness
1.286#63
Pts/opportunity
6.00#11
Success rate
55.6%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.344 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

Disciplined defense — allowing above-average EPA/play
EPA/play allowed
+0.182#102 · below avg
Havoc rate (total)
12.9%#107
Front-7 havoc
8.1%
DB havoc
4.8%
Big play rate allowed
1.348#99
Success rate allowed
33.3%

Disruption comes evenly from front and secondary.

📊

Season Signature

66.0 PPG offense, 14.0 allowed — +52.0 margin/game
Points per game
66.0
Points allowed/game
14.0
Scoring margin/game
+52.0
Turnover margin
+2won 2 · lost 0
Production returning
68%
Talent rank (247)
#58

1-0 record through 1 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE86thEXPLOSIVENESS55thFINISHING93thFIELD POS1thDEFENSE26thHAVOC23th50th100th
Offense
86th
Explosiveness
55th
Finishing
93th
Field Pos
1th
Defense
26th
Havoc
23th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+16.4
#20
Offense
+10.4
#13
Defense
-6.0
#34
Full CORE ratings →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Utah is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Utah in 2026

by EPA/play distance
Wake ForestSP+ +1.6
Off EPA/play +0.443Def EPA/play +0.163Elo 1516
Match
98%
ArmySP+ +2.2
Off EPA/play +0.424Def EPA/play +0.188Elo 1527
Match
98%
TexasSP+ +25.4
Off EPA/play +0.451Def EPA/play +0.142Elo 1913
Match
98%
LouisvilleSP+ +10.0
Off EPA/play +0.474Def EPA/play +0.231Elo 1668
Match
97%
NorthwesternSP+ +7.8
Off EPA/play +0.480Def EPA/play +0.128Elo 1549
Match
97%
Miami (OH)SP+ -10.0
Off EPA/play +0.436Def EPA/play +0.228Elo 1259
Match
97%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: +8.0, #43 of 1282016: +4.0, #50 of 1282017: +5.8, #48 of 1302018: +14.0, #21 of 1302019: +25.6, #8 of 1302020: +1.9, #61 of 1242021: +20.8, #7 of 1302022: +16.5, #12 of 1312023: -0.1, #62 of 1332024: +2.3, #59 of 1342025: +29.1, #7 of 1362026: +16.4, #20 of 138
20152026
Now +16.4 · #20 of 138Best +29.1 in 2025Worst -0.1 in 2023

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.00.0
202511-27-2
85%
10.6+0.4
20245-72-7
42%
6.6-1.6
20238-55-4
62%
8.7-0.7
202210-48-2
71%
9.6+0.4
202110-49-1
71%
10.2-0.2
20203-23-2
60%
3.7-0.7
201911-38-2
79%
11.2-0.2
20189-56-4
64%
9.2-0.2
20177-63-6
54%
7.4-0.4

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

14%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

0-0 so far, projected to finish 7.9-4.2. Top-four bye in 3.2%. Wins the Big 12 in 7.3%.

If they finish with…

100%
0 losses
96%
1 loss
36%
2 losses
2.5%
3 losses
0.2%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 1.

Win out and it is 100%. Running the table settles it.

down 0.6 points since preseason.

  • At 2 losses they are 36% where the average Big 12 team is 46%.
  • The Big 12 takes 1.61 bids in an average season, and four or more in 1.0%.

Utah’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk10vs BYU22.0
  • wk11at Arizona20.8
  • wk12at TCU19.5
  • wk9at Cincinnati18.8
  • wk8vs Houston17.9
  • wk7at Colorado17.8

Who to root for

Games Utah is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk10West Virginia over Texas Tech3.1
  • wk11Oklahoma State over Texas Tech2.2
  • wk2Oregon State over Texas Tech2.0
  • wk5North Carolina over Notre Dame2.0
  • wk6West Virginia over Arizona1.9
  • wk4Purdue over Notre Dame1.9
The full playoff picture →

Big 12

0-0 in league play, projected 5.3-3.74 of 16 by title odds
7.3%
Wins the Big 12
17%
Reaches the title game

The Big 12 sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 45% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk10BYU at Utah12.5
  • wk11Utah at Arizona10.6
  • wk12Utah at TCU9.9
  • wk9Utah at Cincinnati9.5

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Big 12 race →

If not the playoff, then

84%
Bowl eligible
66%
Placed in a bowl
14%
In the playoff
20%
Season over in November

Utah is 1-0 and needs 5 more wins from 11 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 3.8% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • Alamo Bowl11%
  • Texas Bowl9.9%
  • Pop-Tarts Bowl8.9%
  • Liberty Bowl7.7%
  • Rate Bowl7.2%
  • Independence Bowl6.7%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 8 have sent Utah a player since 2010 — 28 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Utah's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
BinghamUT90
Pleasant GroveUT51
San ClementeCA40
Mission ViejoCA30
St. LouisHI30
Frisco Lone StarTX20
HebronTX11
CrenshawCA10
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.