Conference Races
Who wins each of the ten leagues that stage a championship game, from 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons — the same seasons behind the playoff page, so a team’s title odds and its playoff odds are two questions asked of one set of results rather than two models glued together.
A percentage is the share of those seasons ending that way, not a ranking and not a claim about any single game. Rebuilt 2026-09-11.
The leagues do not share a rule
- Sun Belt keeps divisions (East and West) and sends the winner of each — so its second-best record stays home whenever it shares a division with the best one. Taking the top two league-wide instead would stage an impossible title game in 33% of simulated seasons.
- ACC, American Athletic, Mountain West play an unbalanced conference schedule — members do not all play the same number of league games — so the standings are a winning percentage, not a win count. Ranking those by wins promotes whoever drew the extra game.
- Everyone else sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie at the line where the berth is decided.
Every league
The favorite in each, and how often the last berth in the title game is level on conference percentage — which is to say, how often a tiebreaker decides who plays for the trophy rather than the standings deciding it outright.
Big 12
16 teams, no divisions, 9 conference games. The top two by conference winning percentage play for the title.
Each crest carries the team’s chance of winning the league outright. Reaching the title game is a different number and it is in the table below.
Big 12 standings, projected
Title game and title are different questions, and the gap between them is how often a team is expected to get there and lose. The projected conference record is the mean across all 50,000 seasons, so it carries fractions a real record cannot.
The title games it stages most often
Every pairing the simulation produced, most common first. A championship game is two teams surviving twelve weeks apiece, so even the likeliest is a small number — the shape of this list says more than its top row.
- BYU vs Texas Tech18%
- Texas Tech vs Utah9.2%
- Kansas State vs Texas Tech9.1%
- Arizona vs Texas Tech5.5%
- TCU vs Texas Tech3.6%
- Houston vs Texas Tech3.4%
What Texas Tech needs
Texas Tech wins the Big 12 in 43% of simulated seasons and reaches the title game in 65%. These are the remaining results that move that number most — including games they are not playing in, which later in the year are the ones nobody works out for themselves.
- wk3Houston at Texas Techtheir game32.8
- wk9Arizona at Texas Techtheir game32.6
- wk10West Virginia at Texas Techtheir game32.2
- wk7Arizona State at Texas Techtheir game32.0
- wk13TCU at Texas Techtheir game31.2
Points of Texas Tech’s title probability riding on each result.
Since preseason
The Big 12’s best title odds, week by week, on a shared 0–100% scale. Earlier weeks are replayed with the current model rather than recorded at the time, so they say what today’s simulation makes of that week.
Who moved
Change in title probability from preseason to week 1. A league is zero-sum — every point one team gains came off the rest of them.
- Texas Tech42% → 44%+1.6
- Kansas State6.5% → 7.7%+1.1
- BYU16% → 17%+0.8
- Cincinnati1.4% → 2.0%+0.6
- Houston4.1% → 3.3%-0.9
- TCU5.4% → 3.0%-2.4
- Oklahoma State3.7% → 1.0%-2.7
What a conference loss costs
How often each team still wins the Big 12 having lost exactly that many league games. Affords is the most it can take and stay better than even — blank for a team that is not better than even unbeaten.
| Team | 0L | 1L | 2L | 3L | 4L | 5L | 6L | 7L | 8L | 9L | Affords |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Texas Tech | 73 | 58 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
 BYU | 56 | 37 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
 Kansas State | 46 | 31 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
 Utah | 47 | 33 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
 Arizona | 61 | 42 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
 Houston | 49 | 30 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
 TCU | 49 | 37 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
 Arizona State | 51 | 35 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
 Baylor | 47 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
 Cincinnati | 46 | 34 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
 Kansas | 41 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
 UCF | 36 | 23 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
What decides it
The remaining league games ranked by how much the title race is reshaped depending on who wins — measured across every team’s odds at once, not just the favorite’s. Early in a season the front-runner’s own schedule dominates this list, which is not a quirk of the method: it is what a one-team league looks like in September.
- wk3Houston at Texas Techmoves Texas Tech32.8
- wk9Arizona at Texas Techmoves Texas Tech32.6
- wk10West Virginia at Texas Techmoves Texas Tech32.2
- wk7Arizona State at Texas Techmoves Texas Tech32.0
- wk13TCU at Texas Techmoves Texas Tech31.2
- wk5Texas Tech at Coloradomoves Texas Tech30.8
- wk12Texas Tech at Baylormoves Texas Tech30.7
- wk11Texas Tech at Oklahoma Statemoves Texas Tech30.4
What this is still blind to
- Two teams level on conference percentage are separated head-to-head. A three-way tie falls back to point differential, where real leagues run a longer ladder.
- The simulation is market-blind and its committee is fitted rather than consulted — the same four caveats the playoff page states in full.