Skip to content
Harlem Berry

#22Harlem Berry

RB·LSU·2025

Harlem Berry is a Committee Back for LSU. Harlem's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 106 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Harlem Berry's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
491 Rush yards2 Rush TD104 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
8 Receptions32 Rec yards0 Rec TD4.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume39
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving32
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.35 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Texas A&M (SP+ 21).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8300.83Wk 1 vs Clemson: -0.83 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.10 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Florida: -0.25 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs SE Louisiana: -0.08 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Ole Miss: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs South Carolina: -0.47 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Vanderbilt: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Texas A&M: +0.62 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Alabama: +0.28 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Arkansas: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Western Kentucky: -0.08 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Oklahoma: -0.32 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@ClemsonW17-109.5111.00-0.83
2vsLouisiana TechW23-7-1.36569.300.10
3vsFloridaW20-103.5122.00-0.25
4vsSE LouisianaW56-107284.00-0.08
5@Ole MissL19-2424.07223.111200.22
7vsSouth CarolinaW20-105.9420.50120-0.47
8@VanderbiltL24-3120.311555.000.22
9vsTexas A&ML25-4920.79596.610.62
11@AlabamaL9-2014.812665.500.28
12vsArkansasW23-225.111524.7032400.18
13vsWestern KentuckyW13-101.618804.40220-0.08
14@OklahomaL13-1718.314231.60120-0.32
20vsHoustonL35-387.434515.00

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.7%
Passing plays
2.4%
Rushing plays
29.3%
Standard downs
16.3%
Passing downs
8.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.05
Passing downs
0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.13 / 0.10

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.