#6Giovanni Sanders

WR·Arizona State·2023

Giovanni Sanders is a Slot Specialist WR for Arizona State.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.47
Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
Total EPA (value)0.45
Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Giovanni Sanders's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving

15 Receptions133 Rec yards0 Rec TD8.9 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

Efficiency80
Volume13
Explosiveness12
Consistency54
Pass-Down100

Player type

Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)80th %ile · above avg

Game-to-game consistency54th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Above-average efficiency for the WR position (80th percentile).
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.83 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.81 EPA/play in Wk 10 vs Utah (SP+ 9).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗

Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

Player	Team	Yr	Plays	WEPA/play	Line val	Total EPA
Tyler Buchner	Notre Dame	2021	51	0.250	0.3	12.8
Keytaon Thompson	Virginia	2020	39	0.320	0.4	12.5
Nick Nash	San José State	2021	45	0.310	0.5	14.0
Samajie Grant	Arizona	2016	62	0.250	0.3	15.5
Brandon Chatman	Navy	2025	52	0.230	0.6	12.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Rec	Rec Yds	Avg	Long	EPA/play
2	vsOklahoma State	L15-27	6.7	1	4	4.0	4	-0.42
3	vsFresno State	L0-29	2.5	1	9	9.0	9	0.06
5	@California	L21-24	-0.1	5	33	6.6	12	-0.10
6	vsColorado	L24-27	-4.9	2	15	7.5	9	0.90
9	vsWashington State	W38-27	4.9	1	23	23.0	23	1.49
10	@Utah	L3-55	8.5	1	20	20.0	20	2.81
11	@UCLA	W17-7	9.7	1	6	6.0	6	0.18
12	vsOregon	L13-49	26.2	1	4	4.0	4	-0.06
13	vsArizona	L23-59	14.1	2	19	9.5	16	0.80

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

4.7%

Passing plays

8.0%

Rushing plays

0.8%

Standard downs

3.3%

Passing downs

7.4%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.11
Passing downs: 0.67
Pass / Rush EPA: 0.29 / -0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).