Skip to content
Eli Sanders

#1Eli Sanders

Eli Sanders is a Committee Back for Iowa State. Eli's 2023 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 104 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Eli Sanders's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Rushing
477 Rush yards4 Rush TD102 Carries4.7 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions43 Rec yards1 Rec TD8.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume56
  • Explosiveness34
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving18
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.36 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Baylor (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3600.36Wk 1 vs Northern Iowa: -0.22 EPA/play1Wk 4 vs Oklahoma State: +0.04 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Oklahoma: +0.12 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs TCU: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Cincinnati: -0.16 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Baylor: +0.36 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Kansas: -0.03 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs BYU: +0.36 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Texas: -0.15 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsNorthern IowaW30-95132.60-0.22
4vsOklahoma StateW34-276.715583.9121800.04
5@OklahomaL20-5015.07415.901000.12
6vsTCUW27-147.916996.210.17
7@CincinnatiW30-10-6.816523.30-0.16
9@BaylorW30-18-8.314906.4011100.36
10vsKansasL21-289.914574.11-0.03
11@BYUW45-13-3.39576.310.36
12vsTexasL16-2623.26101.701141-0.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
19.5%
Passing plays
1.9%
Rushing plays
36.9%
Standard downs
25.7%
Passing downs
8.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.07
Passing downs
0.11
Pass / Rush EPA
0.95 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.700−0.51
EPA per play · 2024 · 12 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.