Skip to content
Drelon Miller

Drelon Miller

WR·Colorado·20250.0 pts line value

Drelon Miller is a Versatile WR for Colorado. Drelon's 2025 season ranks in the 17th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 71 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Drelon Miller's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
134 Rush yards1 Rush TD46 Carries2.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
21 Receptions159 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.6 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency17
  • Volume31
  • Explosiveness4
  • Consistency1
  • Pass-Down57
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)17th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency1th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.48 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.73 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Wyoming (SP+ -11).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Amare JonesTulane0.1800.012.8
De'Michael HarrisSouthern Miss0.1300.715.2
Hyleck FosterMarshall0.1800.518.2
Davis BrysonKennesaw State0.2000.019.4
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.2200.815.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1701.17Wk 1 vs Georgia Tech: -0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Delaware: -0.66 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Houston: +0.11 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Wyoming: +0.73 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs BYU: +0.72 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs TCU: -0.26 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Utah: -1.17 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona: -0.16 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs West Virginia: +0.31 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Arizona State: -0.20 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Kansas State: -0.82 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsGeorgia TechL20-279.32136.5016-0.54
2vsDelawareW31-7-10.9111.001-0.66
3@HoustonL20-367.43237.70160.11
4vsWyomingW37-20-11.322512.50160.73
5vsBYUL21-2415.922713.51190.72
6@TCUL21-358.3166.006-0.26
9@UtahL7-5322.2-1.17
10vsArizonaL17-5212.02126.009-0.16
11@West VirginiaL22-29-6.84379.30320.31
13vsArizona StateL17-423.93144.708-0.20
14@Kansas StateL14-247.0111.001-0.82

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
10.7%
Passing plays
8.7%
Rushing plays
13.1%
Standard downs
12.2%
Passing downs
8.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.04
Passing downs
-0.00
Pass / Rush EPA
0.07 / -0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.920−1.36
EPA per play · 2025 · 11 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.